Literature DB >> 9754118

Calculation of apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) in brain using two-point and six-point methods.

J H Burdette1, A D Elster, P E Ricci.   

Abstract

We evaluated the relative accuracy of calculating apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of intracranial tissues using a two-point versus a six-point regression technique. Echo planar diffusion-weighted MRI was performed at 1.5 T in three standard locations and in pathologic regions in 10 subjects using gradient strengths corresponding to b values of 1, 100, 200, 500, 800, and 1,000 s/mm2. Estimation of ADCs was made using two methods: a nonlinear regression model using measurements from the full set of b values (six-point technique) and linear estimation using b values of 1 and 1,000 only (two-point technique). A high correlation between the two methods was noted (R2 = 0.999), and the mean percentage difference was 0.84%. These results suggest there is little error in estimating brain ADCs using a two-point technique.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9754118     DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199809000-00023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  15 in total

1.  High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of adult brain: image contrast and apparent diffusion coefficient map features.

Authors:  M C DeLano; T G Cooper; J E Siebert; M J Potchen; K Kuppusamy
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Use of diffusion-weighted imaging to evaluate the initial response of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy to highly active antiretroviral therapy: early experience.

Authors:  C Buckle; M Castillo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Principles and Techniques: Lessons for Clinicians.

Authors:  Vijay P B Grover; Joshua M Tognarelli; Mary M E Crossey; I Jane Cox; Simon D Taylor-Robinson; Mark J W McPhail
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2015-08-20

4.  Interhemispheric asymmetry of brain diffusivity in normal individuals: a diffusion-weighted MR imaging study.

Authors:  Andrew J Fabiano; Mark A Horsfield; Rohit Bakshi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in normal human brains in various age groups.

Authors:  Johanna Helenius; Lauri Soinne; Jussi Perkiö; Oili Salonen; Aki Kangasmäki; Markku Kaste; Richard A D Carano; Hannu J Aronen; Turgut Tatlisumak
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of the head and neck in healthy subjects: reproducibility of ADC values in different MRI systems and repeat sessions.

Authors:  A S Kolff-Gart; P J W Pouwels; D P Noij; R Ljumanovic; V Vandecaveye; F de Keyzer; R de Bree; P de Graaf; D L Knol; J A Castelijns
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Apparent diffusion coefficient in vasogenic edema and reactive astrogliosis.

Authors:  Thomas Hagen; Frank Ahlhelm; Werner Reiche
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Analysis of central nervous system vasculitis with diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient mapping of the normal-appearing brain.

Authors:  M L White; W L Hadley; Y Zhang; M A Dogar
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of subdural empyemas in children.

Authors:  Alex M Wong; Robert A Zimmerman; Erin M Simon; Avrum N Pollock; Larissa T Bilaniuk
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Serial diffusion-weighted imaging in a patient with MELAS and presumed cytotoxic oedema.

Authors:  X Y Wang; K Noguchi; S Takashima; N Hayashi; S Ogawa; H Seto
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.