M A Anderson1, L B Helms. 1. University of Illinois, Chicago College of Nursing, Quad Cities Regional Program, Moline, USA. MAA928@uic.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe and compare the patient-care communication exchanged between personnel in hospitals and nursing homes (NHs) and hospitals and home health agencies (HHAs) in referrals of elderly patients using an adaptation of classic communication theory. Little research on patient-care communication across organizational settings has been reported. This study offers baseline information about inter-organizational communication and insight into barriers to patient care communication. DESIGN: A retrospective, descriptive study using a convenience sample of 455 medical records of referrals to NHs and 300 to HHAs. METHODS: Medical records were audited and a Referral Data Inventory (with established reliability and validity) was completed for each of the records reviewed. Data were collected between January and June 1995. FINDINGS: Greater amounts of referral data were transferred to NHs, than to HHAs. Patient information was composed largely of background and medical data, followed by some nursing care data and limited psychosocial data. Hospitals employed more formal channels of communication in referring patients to NHs than to HHAs, and communicated information more promptly. Some organizational factors related to both the referring hospitals and receiving organizations resulted in discrepancies in patient-care communication. CONCLUSIONS: Continuity of patient care involves a series of coordinating linkages across time, settings, providers, and consumers of health care. Communication is a core task in coordinating patient care. Increased and improved inter-organizational communication is needed when patients are discharged to nursing homes or home health agencies.
PURPOSE: To describe and compare the patient-care communication exchanged between personnel in hospitals and nursing homes (NHs) and hospitals and home health agencies (HHAs) in referrals of elderly patients using an adaptation of classic communication theory. Little research on patient-care communication across organizational settings has been reported. This study offers baseline information about inter-organizational communication and insight into barriers to patient care communication. DESIGN: A retrospective, descriptive study using a convenience sample of 455 medical records of referrals to NHs and 300 to HHAs. METHODS: Medical records were audited and a Referral Data Inventory (with established reliability and validity) was completed for each of the records reviewed. Data were collected between January and June 1995. FINDINGS: Greater amounts of referral data were transferred to NHs, than to HHAs. Patient information was composed largely of background and medical data, followed by some nursing care data and limited psychosocial data. Hospitals employed more formal channels of communication in referring patients to NHs than to HHAs, and communicated information more promptly. Some organizational factors related to both the referring hospitals and receiving organizations resulted in discrepancies in patient-care communication. CONCLUSIONS: Continuity of patient care involves a series of coordinating linkages across time, settings, providers, and consumers of health care. Communication is a core task in coordinating patient care. Increased and improved inter-organizational communication is needed when patients are discharged to nursing homes or home health agencies.
Authors: Chris L Bryson; David H Au; Matthew L Maciejewski; John D Piette; Stephan D Fihn; George L Jackson; Mark Perkins; Edwin S Wong; Elizabeth M Yano; Chuan-Fen Liu Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-01-31 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Dana L Riley; Suzan Krepostman; Donna E Stewart; Neville Suskin; Heather M Arthur; Sherry L Grace Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Jonathan Yee; Karen Unsworth; Neville Suskin; Robert D Reid; Veronica Jamnik; Sherry L Grace Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2011-09-23 Impact factor: 2.655