Literature DB >> 9753586

Molecular, cellular, and neuroanatomical substrates of place learning.

A J Silva1, K P Giese, N B Fedorov, P W Frankland, J H Kogan.   

Abstract

Learning and remembering the location of food resources, predators, escape routes, and immediate kin is perhaps the most essential form of higher cognitive processing in mammals. Two of the most frequently studied forms of place learning are spatial learning and contextual conditioning. Spatial learning refers to an animal's capacity to learn the location of a reward, such as the escape platform in a water maze, while contextual conditioning taps into an animal's ability to associate specific places with aversive stimuli, such as an electric shock. Recently, transgenic and gene targeting techniques have been introduced to the study of place learning. In contrast with the abundant literature on the neuroanatomical substrates of place learning in rats, very little has been done in mice. Thus, in the first part of this article, we will review our studies on the involvement of the hippocampus in both spatial learning and contextual conditioning. Having demonstrated the importance of the hippocampus to place learning, we will then focus attention on the molecular and cellular substrates of place learning. We will show that just as in rats, mouse hippocampal pyramidal cells can show place specific firing. Then, we will review our evidence that hippocampal-dependent place learning involves a number of interacting physiological mechanisms with distinct functions. We will show that in addition to long-term potentiation, the hippocampus uses a number of other mechanisms, such as short-term-plasticity and changes in spiking, to process, store, and recall information. Much of the focus of this article is on genetic studies of learning and memory (L&M). However, there is no single experiment that can unambiguously connect any cellular or molecular mechanism with L&M. Instead, several different types of studies are required to determine whether any one mechanism is involved in L&M, including (i) the development of biologically based learning models that explain the involvement of a given mechanism in L&M, (ii) lesion experiments (genetics and pharmacology), (iii) direct observations during learning, and (iv) experiments where learning is triggered by turning on the candidate mechanism. We will show how genetic techniques will be key to unraveling the molecular and cellular basis of place learning. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9753586     DOI: 10.1006/nlme.1998.3837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  15 in total

1.  Computer-assisted behavioral assessment of Pavlovian fear conditioning in mice.

Authors:  S G Anagnostaras; S A Josselyn; P W Frankland; A J Silva
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 2.  The reuniens and rhomboid nuclei: neuroanatomy, electrophysiological characteristics and behavioral implications.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Cassel; Anne Pereira de Vasconcelos; Michaël Loureiro; Thibault Cholvin; John C Dalrymple-Alford; Robert P Vertes
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 3.  Early life manipulations alter learning and memory in rats.

Authors:  Therese A Kosten; Jeansok J Kim; Hongjoo J Lee
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Genotype differences in anxiety and fear learning and memory of WT and ApoE4 mice associated with enhanced generation of hippocampal reactive oxygen species.

Authors:  Laura E Villasana; Sydney Weber; Tunde Akinyeke; Jacob Raber
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 5.372

5.  Aversive learning under different training conditions: effects of NMDA receptor blockade in area CA1 of the hippocampus.

Authors:  Rafael Roesler; Mônica R M Vianna; Nadja Schröder; Maria Beatriz Cardoso Ferreira; João Quevedo
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 3.996

6.  The central nervous system is a target of acute graft versus host disease in mice.

Authors:  Steffen Hartrampf; Jarrod A Dudakov; Linda K Johnson; Odette M Smith; Jennifer Tsai; Natalie V Singer; Mallory L West; Alan M Hanash; Michael H Albert; Bingfang Liu; Miklos Toth; Marcel R M van den Brink
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  RSK2 signaling in brain habenula contributes to place aversion learning.

Authors:  Emmanuel Darcq; Pascale Koebel; Carolina Del Boca; Solange Pannetier; Anne-Sophie Kirstetter; Jean-Marie Garnier; André Hanauer; Katia Befort; Brigitte L Kieffer
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Abnormal glutamate homeostasis and impaired synaptic plasticity and learning in a mouse model of tuberous sclerosis complex.

Authors:  Ling-Hui Zeng; Yannan Ouyang; Vered Gazit; John R Cirrito; Laura A Jansen; Kevin C Ess; Kelvin A Yamada; David F Wozniak; David M Holtzman; David H Gutmann; Michael Wong
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 5.996

Review 9.  Using the MATRICS to guide development of a preclinical cognitive test battery for research in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jared W Young; Susan B Powell; Victoria Risbrough; Hugh M Marston; Mark A Geyer
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 12.310

10.  Developmental changes in short-term facilitation are opposite at temporoammonic synapses compared to Schaffer collateral synapses onto CA1 pyramidal cells.

Authors:  Haley E Speed; Lynn E Dobrunz
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.899

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.