BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a new immunosuppressive agent that is gaining widespread use in solid organ transplantation recipients. A comprehensive assessment of infectious complications after its use after liver transplantation has never been assessed. METHODS: Bacterial, fungal, and viral infections occurring after transplantation were compared for a cohort of consecutive liver transplant recipients who received MMF (because of suspected tacrolimus-related nephrotoxicity or neurotoxicity) and a cohort who did not receive the drug. All patients received a tacrolimus-based primary immunosuppressive protocol. RESULTS: Biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes within the first 6 months after transplant occurred in 6% of MMF-treated patients but in 30% of those who did not receive MMF (P=0.07). No significant differences were found in occurrence of cytomegalovirus infection or disease, Pneumocystis carinii, Aspergillus, or other fungal infection and hepatitis C virus recurrence between MMF-treated and untreated patients. Bacterial infections were more common in MMF-treated patients, but this cohort had a prolonged intensive care unit stay compared with patients who did not receive MMF. None of the MMF-treated patients with bacterial infection had leukopenia. CONCLUSIONS: MMF use does not appear to be associated with an significantly increased risk of infection occurring after liver transplantation and is associated with fewer episodes of acute rejection.
BACKGROUND:Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a new immunosuppressive agent that is gaining widespread use in solid organ transplantation recipients. A comprehensive assessment of infectious complications after its use after liver transplantation has never been assessed. METHODS: Bacterial, fungal, and viral infections occurring after transplantation were compared for a cohort of consecutive liver transplant recipients who received MMF (because of suspected tacrolimus-related nephrotoxicity or neurotoxicity) and a cohort who did not receive the drug. All patients received a tacrolimus-based primary immunosuppressive protocol. RESULTS: Biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes within the first 6 months after transplant occurred in 6% of MMF-treated patients but in 30% of those who did not receive MMF (P=0.07). No significant differences were found in occurrence of cytomegalovirus infection or disease, Pneumocystis carinii, Aspergillus, or other fungal infection and hepatitis C virus recurrence between MMF-treated and untreated patients. Bacterial infections were more common in MMF-treated patients, but this cohort had a prolonged intensive care unit stay compared with patients who did not receive MMF. None of the MMF-treated patients with bacterial infection had leukopenia. CONCLUSIONS:MMF use does not appear to be associated with an significantly increased risk of infection occurring after liver transplantation and is associated with fewer episodes of acute rejection.
Authors: A Jain; R Kashyap; F Dodson; D Kramer; I Hamad; A Khan; B Eghestad; T E Starzl; J J Fung Journal: Transplantation Date: 2001-09-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Steven K Herrine; Robert S Brown; David E Bernstein; Michael S Ondovik; Ellen Lentz; Helen Te Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 3.487