Literature DB >> 9752878

Perigastric lymph node status as a prognostic indicator in patients with gastric cancer.

Y Adachi1, T Suematsu, N Shiraishi, H Tanimura, A Morimoto, S Kitano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The extent of lymph node dissection and histological examination of dissected lymph nodes varies among countries, which leads to the erroneous nodal stage and different surgical results in gastric cancer (stage migration, 'Will Rogers effect'). The aim of this study was to clarify the prognostic significance of the number of positive perigastric lymph nodes, which could be evaluated simply after D1 gastrectomy.
METHODS: A consecutive series of 106 patients with histologically node-positive gastric cancer treated by radical gastrectomy and lymph node dissection (D2 or D3) was studied. The number of metastatic perigastric nodes (level I, nos 1-6) was examined, and its influence on the survival of patients was analysed.
RESULTS: The overall 5-year survival rate was 50.9 per cent; the 5-year survival rate was significantly decreased when positive perigastric nodes exceeded six (62 per cent for one to six nodes versus 23 per cent for seven or more nodes, P< 0.001). Tumours having one to six positive perigastric nodes compared with those having seven or more positive perigastric nodes were more likely to have a size less than 4 cm (29 per cent versus one of 30, P< 0.001), grossly localized type (45 per cent versus seven of 30, P=0.042), absence of serosal invasion (32 per cent versus none of 30, P=0.002) and metastasis limited to the perigastric lymph nodes (70 per cent versus seven of 30, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the number of positive perigastric nodes correlates with tumour progression and patient survival. This parameter is a simple and useful prognostic indicator for node-positive gastric cancer, and is available not only for D2 and D3 gastrectomy but also for D1 gastrectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9752878     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00833.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  5 in total

Review 1.  Subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Roberto Santoro; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre; Eugenio Santoro
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Clinicopathology and Survival in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux After Radical Surgery of Proximal Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Ke-Ming Ying; Zheng Chen; Cheng-Xue Dang; Min-Chang Sun; Gui-Ru Yan; Bing-Hua Kan; Zi-Seng Xu
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Prognostic factors in patients with node-negative gastric carcinoma: a comparison with node-positive gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Dong Yi Kim; Kyeung Won Seo; Jae Kyoon Joo; Young Kyu Park; Seong Yeob Ryu; Hyeong Rok Kim; Young Jin Kim; Shin Kon Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Gasless laparoscopy-assisted subtotal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: a novel minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Tzung-Hsin Chou; Ming-Hsun Wu; Ming-Yang Wang; Ching-Yao Yang; Peng-Sheng Lai; Ming-Tsan Lin; Po-Huang Lee
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  The effect of perigastric lipolymphatic tissue grouping by surgeon on the number of pathologic sampled lymph nodes after radical gastrectomy.

Authors:  Yinghao Cao; Lijuan Xiong; Shenghe Deng; Liming Shen; Jiang Li; Ke Wu; Jiliang Wang; KaiXiong Tao; Guobin Wang; Kailin Cai
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.