Literature DB >> 9752374

Linking primary care performance to outcomes of care.

D G Safran1, D A Taira, W H Rogers, M Kosinski, J E Ware, A R Tarlov.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Substantial research links many of the defining characteristics of primary care to important outcomes; yet little is known about the relative importance of each characteristic, and several characteristics have not been examined. These analyses evaluate the relationship between seven defining elements of primary care (accessibility, continuity, comprehensiveness, integration, clinical interaction, interpersonal treatment, and trust) and three outcomes (adherence to physician's advice, patient satisfaction, and improved health status).
METHODS: Data were derived from a cross-sectional observational study of adults employed by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (N = 7204). All patients completed a validated questionnaire, the Primary Care Assessment Survey. Regression methods were used to examine the association between each primary care characteristic (11 summary scales measuring 7 elements of care) and each outcome.
RESULTS: Physicians' comprehensive ("whole person") knowledge of patients and patients' trust in their physician were the variables most strongly associated with adherence, and trust was the variable most strongly associated with patients' satisfaction with their physician. With other factors equal, adherence rates were 2.6 times higher among patients with whole-person knowledge scores in the 95th percentile compared with the 5th percentile (44.0% adherence vs 16.8% adherence, P < .001). The likelihood of complete satisfaction was 87.5% for those with 95th percentile trust scores compared with 0.4% for patients with 5th percentile trust scores (P < .001). The leading correlates of self-reported health improvements were integration of care, thoroughness of physical examinations, communication, comprehensive knowledge of patients, and trust (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients' trust in their physician and physicians' knowledge of patients are leading correlates of three important outcomes of care. The results are noteworthy in the context of pervasive changes in our nation's health care system that are widely viewed as threatening to the quality of physician-patient relationships.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9752374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  241 in total

1.  Type of health insurance and the quality of primary care experience.

Authors:  L Shi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Racial and ethnic disparities and primary care experience.

Authors:  C M Clancy; D B Stryer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Trust, distrust and trustworthiness.

Authors:  Susan Dorr Goold
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Disparities in health and health care: moving from describing the problem to a call for action.

Authors:  C M Mangione; E Reynolds
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Methods for evaluating practice change toward a patient-centered medical home.

Authors:  Carlos Roberto Jaén; Benjamin F Crabtree; Raymond F Palmer; Robert L Ferrer; Paul A Nutting; William L Miller; Elizabeth E Stewart; Robert Wood; Marivel Davila; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Primary care experiences of medicare beneficiaries, 1998 to 2000.

Authors:  Jana E Montgomery; Julie T Irish; Ira B Wilson; Hong Chang; Angela C Li; William H Rogers; Dana Gelb Safran
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Does patient-centered care improve provision of preventive services?

Authors:  Stephen D Flach; Kimberly D McCoy; Thomas E Vaughn; Marcia M Ward; Bonnie J Bootsmiller; Bradley N Doebbeling
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Disparities in primary care for vulnerable children: the influence of multiple risk factors.

Authors:  Gregory D Stevens; Michael Seid; Ritesh Mistry; Neal Halfon
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  How can the principles of complexity science be applied to improve the coordination of care for complex pediatric patients?

Authors:  A G Matlow; J G Wright; B Zimmerman; K Thomson; M Valente
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-04

10.  Effects of patient-centered medical home attributes on patients' perceptions of quality in federally supported health centers.

Authors:  Lydie A Lebrun-Harris; Leiyu Shi; Jinsheng Zhu; Matthew T Burke; Alek Sripipatana; Quyen Ngo-Metzger
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.