Literature DB >> 9751721

Promoter opening via a DNA fork junction binding activity.

Y Guo1, J D Gralla.   

Abstract

The rate-limiting step in transcriptional initiation typically is opening the promoter DNA to expose the template strand. Opening is tightly regulated, but how it occurs is not known. These experiments identify an activity, recognition of specific DNA fork junctions, and suggest that it is critical to bacterial promoter opening. This activity is both sequence and structure specific; it recognizes the bases that constitute the upstream double-stranded/single-stranded boundary of the open complex. Promoter mutations known to reduce opening rates lead to comparable reductions in fork junction binding affinity. The activity acts to establish the upstream boundary of melted DNA and works in conjunction with two single-stranded DNA binding activities that recognize separately the two melted strands. The junction binding activity is contained within the sigma factor component of the holoenzyme. The activity occurs in both a typical prokaryotic transcription system and in a eukaryotic-like bacterial system that responds to enhancers and needs ATP. Thus DNA opening catalyzed by fork junction binding may occur in a variety of systems in which DNA must be opened to be copied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9751721      PMCID: PMC21696          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.20.11655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  36 in total

1.  Structure of transcription elongation complexes in vivo.

Authors:  M Kainz; J Roberts
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-02-14       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Mutant sigma factor blocks transition between promoter binding and initiation of transcription.

Authors:  C H Jones; C P Moran
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Role of eukaryotic-type functional domains found in the prokaryotic enhancer receptor factor sigma 54.

Authors:  S Sasse-Dwight; J D Gralla
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-09-07       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Polypeptides containing highly conserved regions of transcription initiation factor sigma 70 exhibit specificity of binding to promoter DNA.

Authors:  A J Dombroski; W A Walter; M T Record; D A Siegele; C A Gross
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-08-07       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Specific binding of the transcription factor sigma-54 to promoter DNA.

Authors:  M Buck; W Cannon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-07-30       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Crystal structure of a sigma 70 subunit fragment from E. coli RNA polymerase.

Authors:  A Malhotra; E Severinova; S A Darst
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-10-04       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Changes in the DNA structure of the lac UV5 promoter during formation of an open complex with Escherichia coli RNA polymerase.

Authors:  A Spassky; K Kirkegaard; H Buc
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1985-05-21       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Conserved sequence motifs in the small subunit of human general transcription factor TFIIE.

Authors:  H Sumimoto; Y Ohkuma; E Sinn; H Kato; S Shimasaki; M Horikoshi; R G Roeder
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-12-05       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Effects of amino acid substitutions in the -10 binding region of sigma E from Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  C H Jones; K M Tatti; C P Moran
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Highly conserved core domain and unique N terminus with presumptive regulatory motifs in a human TATA factor (TFIID).

Authors:  A Hoffman; E Sinn; T Yamamoto; J Wang; A Roy; M Horikoshi; R G Roeder
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-07-26       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  49 in total

1.  Function-based selection and characterization of base-pair polymorphisms in a promoter of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase-sigma(70).

Authors:  J Xu; B C McCabe; G B Koudelka
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Regulation of sigma 54-dependent transcription by core promoter sequences: role of -12 region nucleotides.

Authors:  L Wang; Y Guo; J D Gralla
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Escherichia coli promoter opening and -10 recognition: mutational analysis of sigma70.

Authors:  M S Fenton; S J Lee; J D Gralla
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  The amino terminus of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium sigma(54) is required for interactions with an enhancer-binding protein and binding to fork junction DNA.

Authors:  M T Kelly; T R Hoover
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Fine structure of E. coli RNA polymerase-promoter interactions: alpha subunit binding to the UP element minor groove.

Authors:  W Ross; A Ernst; R L Gourse
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Transcription initiation-defective forms of sigma(54) that differ in ability To function with a heteroduplex DNA template.

Authors:  M T Kelly; J A Ferguson; T R Hoover
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 7.  The bacterial enhancer-dependent sigma(54) (sigma(N)) transcription factor.

Authors:  M Buck; M T Gallegos; D J Studholme; Y Guo; J D Gralla
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Function of the bacterial TATAAT -10 element as single-stranded DNA during RNA polymerase isomerization.

Authors:  M S Fenton; J D Gralla
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Interactions of regulated and deregulated forms of the sigma54 holoenzyme with heteroduplex promoter DNA.

Authors:  Wendy Cannon; Siva R Wigneshweraraj; Martin Buck
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Interaction of RNA polymerase with forked DNA: evidence for two kinetically significant intermediates on the pathway to the final complex.

Authors:  Laura Tsujikawa; Oleg V Tsodikov; Pieter L deHaseth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.