Literature DB >> 9749850

Prospective randomized comparison of the Shouldice and Lichtenstein hernia repair procedures.

J E McGillicuddy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the Lichtenstein, tension-free mesh, and the Shouldice, 4-layer Bassini repair of the inguinal hernia.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical trial.
SETTING: A private suburban hernia center. PATIENTS: Six hundred seventy-two men with inguinal hernias, aged 20 to 90 years, seen at the hernia center between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 1995.
INTERVENTIONS: Slightly modified Shouldice and Lichtenstein repairs were used to repair primary and recurrent inguinal hernias. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recurrence rates, symptoms (including patient satisfaction), and infections.
RESULTS: A total of 717 repairs in 672 patients, including 45 bilateral repairs, have been monitored to date. Recurrence of hernia occurred in 7 Shouldice repairs and 2 mesh repairs. Twelve superficial infections associated with Shouldice and 6 associated with mesh repairs were found.
CONCLUSIONS: Both types of hernia repair are comparable and effective, but long-term results favor the Lichtenstein technique for reducing recurrences (to a P value of .10), ease of technical mastery, and application to the outpatient setting by use of a local anesthetic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9749850     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.133.9.974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  27 in total

1.  Long-term follow-up after Lichtenstein hernioplasty in a general surgical unit.

Authors:  L Verstraete; H Swannet
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Inguinal hernia: measurement of the biomechanics of the lower abdominal wall and the inguinal canal.

Authors:  T Wolloscheck; A Gaumann; A Terzic; A Heintz; T Junginger; M A Konerding
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2004-04-20       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Coskun repair of inguinal hernia: is it really new?

Authors:  Julian E Losanoff; Parviz K Amid
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-10-22       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Discomfort five years after laparoscopic and Shouldice inguinal hernia repair: a randomised trial with 867 patients. A report from the SMIL study group.

Authors:  Fritz H Berndsen; U Petersson; D Arvidsson; C-E Leijonmarck; C Rudberg; S Smedberg; A Montgomery
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Coskun repair of inguinal hernia. Response to Losanoff JE and Amid PK.

Authors:  Faruk Coskun; M Mahir Ozmen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Commentary on: Pokorny H, Klingler A, Schmid T, Fortelny R, Hollinsky C, Kawji R, Steiner E, Pernthaler H, Függer R, Scheyer M (2008) Recurrence and complications after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial. Hernia DOI 10.1007/s10029-008-0357-1.

Authors:  P K Amid
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Pure tissue inguinal hernia repair with the use of biological mesh: a 10-year follows up. A prospective study.

Authors:  B Ravo; Giuliano Falasco
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  A prospective trial of primary inguinal hernia repair by surgical trainees.

Authors:  B W Miedema; S M Ibrahim; B D Davis; D G Koivunen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients.

Authors:  M P Simons; T Aufenacker; M Bay-Nielsen; J L Bouillot; G Campanelli; J Conze; D de Lange; R Fortelny; T Heikkinen; A Kingsnorth; J Kukleta; S Morales-Conde; P Nordin; V Schumpelick; S Smedberg; M Smietanski; G Weber; M Miserez
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.