Literature DB >> 9749323

Couple childbearing plans and births in Sweden.

E Thomson1, J M Hoem.   

Abstract

We use data from a nationally representative sample of Swedish couples to estimate effects of partners' childbearing plans on the rate of subsequent childbearing. Only 11% of the couples in this sample expressed plans in opposite directions (plan to have a child versus not to have a child), but 24% had differing levels of certainty about their plans. Of the couples in which both partners said they definitely planned to have another child, 44% had a child within two years. If neither partner planned to have another child, less than 2% of couples had a birth. The figure was 6% if the partners had opposing childbearing plans. Thus, both men and women exerted veto power over further childbearing. Disagreements were equally likely to be resolved in favor of the woman as of the man, and effects of partners' plans on the birth hazard did not depend on the couple's gender arrangements, family ideologies, or marital status. We discuss these results in the context of Sweden's public support for gender equality and for childrearing, its pervasive contraceptive regime, and its high rates of cohabitation. We also argue for the collection of data from partners in future family and fertility surveys.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9749323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Demography        ISSN: 0070-3370


  12 in total

1.  Wives' and husbands' expected costs and benefits of childbearing as predictors of pregnancy.

Authors:  E S Fried; J R Udry
Journal:  Soc Biol       Date:  1979

2.  Couple disagreement: effects on the formation and implementation of fertility decisions.

Authors:  W B Miller; D J Pasta
Journal:  Pers Relatsh       Date:  1996-09

3.  The potential impact of improvements in contraception on fertility and abortion in Western countries.

Authors:  C F Westoff; C R Hammerslough; L Paul
Journal:  Eur J Popul       Date:  1987-11

4.  Husband or wife? A multivariate analysis of decision making for voluntary sterilization.

Authors:  M P Clark; G Swicegood
Journal:  J Fam Issues       Date:  1982-09

5.  Female labour force participation, fertility and public policy in Sweden.

Authors:  M Sundstrom; F P Stafford
Journal:  Eur J Popul       Date:  1992

6.  Social and psychological factors affecting fertility. XXXII. The number of children desired at the time of marriage.

Authors:  H V MUHSAM; C V KISER
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q       Date:  1956-07

7.  Couple childbearing desires, intentions, and births.

Authors:  E Thomson
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1997-08

8.  Measuring fertility demand.

Authors:  E Thomson; Y Brandreth
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1995-02

9.  Changes in fertility expectations and preferences between 1962 and 1977: their relation to final parity.

Authors:  R Freedman; D S Freedman; A D Thornton
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1980-11

10.  A joint model of marital childbearing and marital disruption.

Authors:  L A Lillard; L J Waite
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1993-11
View more
  5 in total

1.  Partners' Educational Pairings and Fertility Across Europe.

Authors:  Natalie Nitsche; Anna Matysiak; Jan Van Bavel; Daniele Vignoli
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2018-08

2.  The Relationship between Partners' Family-Size Preferences in Southern Malawi.

Authors:  Sara Yeatman; Christie Sennott
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2014-09

3.  Couples' unmet need for family planning in three West African countries.

Authors:  Erin Pearson; Stan Becker
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2014-09

4.  Sampling Weights for Analyses of Couple Data: Example of the Demographic and Health Surveys.

Authors:  Stan Becker; Amanda Kalamar
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2018-08

5.  Fertility in Advanced Societies: A Review of Research: La fécondité dans les sociétés avancées: un examen des recherches.

Authors:  Nicoletta Balbo; Francesco C Billari; Melinda Mills
Journal:  Eur J Popul       Date:  2012-09-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.