Literature DB >> 9747870

Benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide and bleomycin sensitivity and susceptibility to cancer of upper aerodigestive tract.

X Wu1, J Gu, W K Hong, J J Lee, C I Amos, H Jiang, R J Winn, K K Fu, J Cooper, M R Spitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tobacco smoking is an established risk factor for cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract, and measurement of chromosomal aberrations, i.e., chromatid breaks, induced in lymphocytes in vitro by bleomycin has been shown to be a predictor of risk for these cancers. In a case-control study, we recruited case subjects who were previously treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy for stage I or stage II squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck to test the hypothesis that lymphocytic chromatid breaks induced by benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide (BPDE), a tobacco mutagen, may also be associated with risk of developing cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract.
METHODS: Case subjects were matched to control subjects on the basis of age, sex, ethnicity, and smoking status. Primary lymphocytes from 67 case subjects and 81 control subjects were treated with 2 microM BPDE for 24 hours, and the frequency of induced chromatid breaks was determined. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: Lymphocytes from case subjects compared with lymphocytes from control subjects showed significantly more breaks per cell induced by BPDE (mean+/-standard deviation, 0.77+/-0.38 versus 0.49+/-0.25; P<.001). Lymphocytes from 64.2% of case subjects were sensitive to BPDE (using a cutoff value of > or =0.60 break per cell). Subjects in the highest quartile of chromatid breaks had an approximately 20-fold increased risk of cancer compared with those in the lowest quartile after adjustment for age, sex, ethnicity, and smoking status. The association between BPDE sensitivity and cancer risk was higher in former smokers than in current smokers and higher in younger patients than in older patients. Subjects with sensitivity to both BPDE and bleomycin were at a 19.2-fold increased risk of cancer compared with those who were not sensitive to either agent.
CONCLUSIONS: Mutagen sensitivity assays may aid in identifying individuals at risk of cancer, and use of parallel assays with two mutagens may improve risk predictability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9747870     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/90.18.1393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  8 in total

1.  Functional characterization of Ape1 variants identified in the human population.

Authors:  M Z Hadi; M A Coleman; K Fidelis; H W Mohrenweiser; D M Wilson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Double-strand breaks repair in lymphoblastoid cell lines from sisters discordant for breast cancer from the New York site of the BCFR.

Authors:  Nicola Machella; Mary Beth Terry; Jennifer Zipprich; Irina Gurvich; Yuyan Liao; Ruby T Senie; David O Kennedy; Regina M Santella
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 4.944

3.  Hypersensitivity to chemoradiation in FANCA carrier with cervical carcinoma-A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Igor Sirák; Zuzana Šinkorová; Mária Šenkeříková; Jiří Špaček; Jan Laco; Hana Vošmiková; Stanislav John; Jiří Petera
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-12-05

4.  A genetic variant near the PMAIP1/Noxa gene is associated with increased bleomycin sensitivity.

Authors:  Jian Gu; Yuanqing Ye; Margaret R Spitz; Jie Lin; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Jingliang Xing; Michelle A T Hildebrandt; Waun Ki Hong; Christopher I Amos; Xifeng Wu
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  Bladder cancer predisposition: a multigenic approach to DNA-repair and cell-cycle-control genes.

Authors:  Xifeng Wu; Jian Gu; H Barton Grossman; Christopher I Amos; Carol Etzel; Maosheng Huang; Qing Zhang; Randal E Millikan; Seth Lerner; Colin P Dinney; Margaret R Spitz
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  DNA repair phenotype and cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 55 case-control studies.

Authors:  Hui-Chen Wu; Rebecca Kehm; Regina M Santella; David J Brenner; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  High γ-radiation sensitivity is associated with increased gastric cancer risk in a Chinese Han population: a case-control analysis.

Authors:  Honglin Dong; Xiaowei Jin; Jie Hu; Haifeng Li; Xianli He; Xiaonan Liu; Guoqiang Bao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Chromosomal radiosensitivity in head and neck cancer patients: evidence for genetic predisposition?

Authors:  K De Ruyck; V de Gelder; M Van Eijkeren; T Boterberg; W De Neve; A Vral; H Thierens
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.