Literature DB >> 9747501

Static aspects of accommodation: age and presbyopia.

J A Mordi1, K J Ciuffreda.   

Abstract

Although the progressive reduction in accommodative amplitude with increased age is well documented, little is known about several other aspects of static or steady-state accommodation to provide a comprehensive assessment of changes related to age and presbyopia. Static components of accommodation (tonic accommodation, depth-of-focus, slope of the stimulus/response function, and accommodative controller gain) were assessed objectively using an infrared (IR) optometer in 30 human subjects aged 21-50 years; depth-of-focus was also determined psychophysically as was accommodative amplitude. Tonic accommodation and the amplitude of accommodation decreased with increased age, whereas the subjective depth-of-focus increased; the other parameters remained unchanged. The decrease in tonic accommodation and amplitude of accommodation was attributed to biomechanical factors, whereas the increase in subjective depth-of-focus was believed to result from increased tolerance to defocus related to the gradual onset of presbyopia. Constancy of the objective depth-of-focus suggested absence of age effects on the neurologic control of reflex accommodation, whereas the lack of systematic change in slope and controller gain provided support for the Hess-Gullstrand theory of accommodation and presbyopia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9747501     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00336-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  13 in total

1.  An objective technique to measure the depth-of-focus in free space.

Authors:  Balamurali Vasudevan; Kenneth J Ciuffreda; Bin Wang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Lens fluorescence and accommodative amplitude in pre-presbyopic and presbyopic subjects.

Authors:  Xianmin Luo; Steven M Kymes; Mae O Gordon; Steven Bassnett
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 3.467

3.  Accommodative Gain in Relation to Perceived Target Clarity.

Authors:  Tawna L Roberts; Heather A Anderson; Karla K Stuebing
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Effects of age on dynamic accommodation.

Authors:  Thurmon E Lockhart; Wen Shi
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Tonic accommodation predicts closed-loop accommodation responses.

Authors:  Chunming Liu; Stefanie A Drew; Eric Borsting; Amy Escobar; Lawrence Stark; Christopher Chase
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Pupil diameter, working distance and illumination during habitual tasks. Implications for simultaneous vision contact lenses for presbyopia.

Authors:  Genís Cardona; Sílvia López
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2015-10-09

7.  Depth-of-field of the accommodating eye.

Authors:  Paula Bernal-Molina; Robert Montés-Micó; Richard Legras; Norberto López-Gil
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  The distribution of negative and positive relative accommodation and their relationship with binocular and refractive indices in a young population.

Authors:  AbbasAli Yekta; Hassan Hashemi; Mehdi Khabazkhoob; Hadi Ostadimoghaddam; Somayeh Ghasemi-Moghaddam; Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur; Fereshteh Shokrollahzadeh
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-21

9.  Comparison of three monocular methods for measuring accommodative stimulus-response curves.

Authors:  Yunyun Chen; Wanqing Jin; Zhili Zheng; Chuanchuan Zhang; Huiling Lin; Björn Drobe; Jinhua Bao; Hao Chen
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.742

10.  Adaptation to Progressive Additive Lenses: Potential Factors to Consider.

Authors:  Tara L Alvarez; Eun H Kim; Bérangère Granger-Donetti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.