Literature DB >> 9746543

Multiphoton excitation provides optical sections from deeper within scattering specimens than confocal imaging.

V E Centonze1, J G White.   

Abstract

Multiphoton excitation fluorescence imaging generates an optical section of sample by restricting fluorophore excitation to the plane of focus. High photon densities, achieved only in the focal volume of the objective, are sufficient to excite the fluorescent probe molecules by density-dependent, multiphoton excitation processes. We present comparisons of confocal with multiphoton excitation imaging of identical optical sections within a sample. These side-by-side comparisons of imaging modes demonstrate a significant advantage of multiphoton imaging; data can be obtained from deeper within biological specimens. Observations on a variety of biological samples showed that in all cases there was at least a twofold improvement in the imaging penetration depth obtained with multiphoton excitation relative to confocal imaging. The more pronounced degradation in image contrast deep within a confocally imaged sample is primarily due to scattered emission photons, which reduce the signal and increase the local background as measurements of point spread functions indicated that resolution does not significantly change with increasing depth for either mode of microscopy. Multiphoton imaging does not suffer from degradation of signal-to-background to nearly the same extent as confocal imaging because this method is insensitive to scatter of the emitted signal. Direct detection of emitted photons using an external photodetector mounted close to the objective (possible only in a multiphoton imaging system) improves system sensitivity and the utilization of scattered emission photons for imaging. We demonstrate that this technique provides yet further improvements in the capability of multiphoton excitation imaging to produce good quality images from deeper within tissue relative to confocal imaging.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9746543      PMCID: PMC1299873          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77643-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  14 in total

1.  Wavelength dependence of cell cloning efficiency after optical trapping.

Authors:  H Liang; K T Vu; P Krishnan; T C Trang; D Shin; S Kimel; M W Berns
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Photon upmanship: why multiphoton imaging is more than a gimmick.

Authors:  W Denk; K Svoboda
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  W Denk; J H Strickler; W W Webb
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-04-06       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Direct measurement of coupling between dendritic spines and shafts.

Authors:  K Svoboda; D W Tank; W Denk
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-05-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Anatomical and functional imaging of neurons using 2-photon laser scanning microscopy.

Authors:  W Denk; K R Delaney; A Gelperin; D Kleinfeld; B W Strowbridge; D W Tank; R Yuste
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Confocal microscopy in turbid media.

Authors:  J M Schmitt; A Knüttel; M Yadlowsky
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Two types of calcium response limited to single spines in cerebellar Purkinje cells.

Authors:  W Denk; M Sugimori; R Llinás
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Two-photon molecular excitation provides intrinsic 3-dimensional resolution for laser-based microscopy and microphotochemistry.

Authors:  R M Williams; D W Piston; W W Webb
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Three-dimensional chromatin distribution in neuroblastoma nuclei shown by confocal scanning laser microscopy.

Authors:  G J Brakenhoff; H T van der Voort; E A van Spronsen; W A Linnemans; N Nanninga
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Oct 24-30       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  An evaluation of confocal versus conventional imaging of biological structures by fluorescence light microscopy.

Authors:  J G White; W B Amos; M Fordham
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  138 in total

Review 1.  Principles and practices of laser scanning confocal microscopy.

Authors:  S W Paddock
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Photobleaching in two-photon excitation microscopy.

Authors:  G H Patterson; D W Piston
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Depth penetration and detection of pH gradients in biofilms by two-photon excitation microscopy.

Authors:  J M Vroom; K J De Grauw; H C Gerritsen; D J Bradshaw; P D Marsh; G K Watson; J J Birmingham; C Allison
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Applying multiphoton imaging to the study of membrane dynamics in living cells.

Authors:  J G White; J M Squirrell; K W Eliceiri
Journal:  Traffic       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.215

5.  Quantitative analysis of three-dimensional-resolved fiber architecture in heterogeneous skeletal muscle tissue using nmr and optical imaging methods.

Authors:  V J Napadow; Q Chen; V Mai; P T So; R J Gilbert
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Mitotic spindle rotation and mode of cell division in the developing telencephalon.

Authors:  Tarik F Haydar; Eugenius Ang; Pasko Rakic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-02-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Wide field intravital imaging by two-photon-excitation digital-scanned light-sheet microscopy (2p-DSLM) with a high-pulse energy laser.

Authors:  Atsushi Maruyama; Yusuke Oshima; Hiroko Kajiura-Kobayashi; Shigenori Nonaka; Takeshi Imamura; Kiyoshi Naruse
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Two-photon autofluorescence dynamics imaging reveals sensitivity of intracellular NADH concentration and conformation to cell physiology at the single-cell level.

Authors:  Qianru Yu; Ahmed A Heikal
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 6.252

9.  Both cyclin B levels and DNA-replication checkpoint control the early embryonic mitoses in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jun-Yuan Ji; Jayne M Squirrell; Gerold Schubiger
Journal:  Development       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Longitudinal in vivo two-photon fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  Sarah E Crowe; Graham C R Ellis-Davies
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 3.215

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.