R French1, P Brocklehurst. 1. Department of Sexually Transmitted Diseases, The Mortimer Market Centre, London, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of pregnancy on disease progression and survival in women infected with HIV by a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. METHODS: Appropriate publications were identified using electronic and hand searching of relevant journals from 1983 to 1996. Studies were included in the review if they were cohort studies, either prospective or retrospective, or case-control studies which investigated disease progression of pregnant women infected with HIV and included a control group of non-pregnant women infected with HIV for comparison. Methodological quality was assessed for each study. Data were extracted for predetermined outcome measures. Sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the association between pregnancy and disease progression for the following study characteristics: clinical setting (developed or developing countries), methodological quality (high or poor) and whether studies had controlled for potential confounding. RESULTS: Seven studies, all prospective cohorts, were eligible to be included in the review. The summary odds ratio for the risk of an adverse maternal outcome related to HIV infection and pregnancy were as follows: death 1.8 (85% CI 0.99-3.3); HIV disease progression 1.41 (95% CI 0.85-2.33); progression to an AIDS-defining illness 1.63 (95% CI 1.00-2.67) and fall of CD4 cell count to below 200 x 10(6)/L 0.73 (95% CI 0.17-3.06). Sensitivity analyses showed that HIV progression in pregnancy was significantly more common in a developing country setting (odds ratio 3.71, 95% CI 1.82-7.75) than in developed countries (odds ratio 0.55, 95% 0.27-1.11) and also significantly more common in high quality studies when compared to low quality ones, odds ratios 3.71 (95% CI 1.82-7.57) and 0.55 (95% CI 0.27-1.11), respectively. However, there appears to be less progression of HIV disease and progression to AIDS when studies attempted to control for confounding by matching or restriction techniques, although this was not statistically significant in either case. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review have implications for women infected with HIV who are pregnant or are considering a pregnancy. There does appear to be an association between adverse maternal outcomes and pregnancy in women infected with HIV, although this association is not strong. The relation may be due to the result of bias including residual confounding. Further large scale observational studies with long term follow up are required before this issue can be fully resolved.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of pregnancy on disease progression and survival in women infected with HIV by a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. METHODS: Appropriate publications were identified using electronic and hand searching of relevant journals from 1983 to 1996. Studies were included in the review if they were cohort studies, either prospective or retrospective, or case-control studies which investigated disease progression of pregnant women infected with HIV and included a control group of non-pregnant women infected with HIV for comparison. Methodological quality was assessed for each study. Data were extracted for predetermined outcome measures. Sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the association between pregnancy and disease progression for the following study characteristics: clinical setting (developed or developing countries), methodological quality (high or poor) and whether studies had controlled for potential confounding. RESULTS: Seven studies, all prospective cohorts, were eligible to be included in the review. The summary odds ratio for the risk of an adverse maternal outcome related to HIV infection and pregnancy were as follows: death 1.8 (85% CI 0.99-3.3); HIV disease progression 1.41 (95% CI 0.85-2.33); progression to an AIDS-defining illness 1.63 (95% CI 1.00-2.67) and fall of CD4 cell count to below 200 x 10(6)/L 0.73 (95% CI 0.17-3.06). Sensitivity analyses showed that HIV progression in pregnancy was significantly more common in a developing country setting (odds ratio 3.71, 95% CI 1.82-7.75) than in developed countries (odds ratio 0.55, 95% 0.27-1.11) and also significantly more common in high quality studies when compared to low quality ones, odds ratios 3.71 (95% CI 1.82-7.57) and 0.55 (95% CI 0.27-1.11), respectively. However, there appears to be less progression of HIV disease and progression to AIDS when studies attempted to control for confounding by matching or restriction techniques, although this was not statistically significant in either case. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review have implications for women infected with HIV who are pregnant or are considering a pregnancy. There does appear to be an association between adverse maternal outcomes and pregnancy in women infected with HIV, although this association is not strong. The relation may be due to the result of bias including residual confounding. Further large scale observational studies with long term follow up are required before this issue can be fully resolved.
Entities:
Keywords:
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Biology; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Developing Countries; Diseases; Hiv Infections; Immunity; Immunological Effects; Literature Review; Maternal Mortality; Mortality; Physiology; Population; Population Characteristics; Population Dynamics; Pregnancy; Pregnant Women; Reproduction; Research Methodology; Risk Factors; Viral Diseases
Authors: Rebecca Marie Zash; Sajini Souda; Jean Leidner; Kelebogile Binda; Chazha Hick; Kathleen Powis; Joseph Makhema; Mompati Mmalane; Max Essex; Shahin Lockman; Roger L Shapiro Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Vernon Mochache; Barbra A Richardson; Linnet N Masese; Susan M Graham; Kishorchandra Mandaliya; John Kinuthia; Walter Jaoko; Julie Overbaugh; R Scott McClelland Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: Elizabeth M Stringer; Mark Giganti; Rosalind J Carter; Wafaa El-Sadr; Elaine J Abrams; Jeffrey Sa Stringer Journal: AIDS Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: V Le Moing; A Taïeb; P Longuet; C Lewden; V Delcey; M C Thiebaut Drobacheff; G Chêne; C Leport Journal: HIV Med Date: 2008-09-14 Impact factor: 3.180
Authors: Lynn T Matthews; Angela Kaida; Steven Kanters; Helen Byakwagamd; A Rain Mocello; Conrad Muzoora; Annet Kembabazi; Jessica E Haberer; Jeffrey N Martin; David R Bangsberg; Peter W Hunt Journal: AIDS Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 4.177