Literature DB >> 9746133

The timing of color and location processing in the motor context.

L Pisella1, M Arzi, Y Rossetti.   

Abstract

In this study, the use of color and location as stimulus attributes manipulated during a simple action was aimed at comparing how dorsal (location) and ventral (color) features are integrated in action and the timing of their processing. Eighteen subjects were presented with a green dot on a computer screen, which they were required to point at and touch. In 20% of the trials, the location or the color of the target was altered at the onset of movement to this stimulus, requiring the participant to modify the initially programmed response according to specific motor instructions. In the 'location-go' group, the target changed in location and participants were instructed to reach the displaced stimulus by correcting their ongoing movement. In the 'location-stop' and 'color-stop' groups, subjects were instructed to interrupt their movement when the target changed location or color, respectively. Results showed that the latency of the first responses to the perturbation clearly depended on the stimulus attribute and not on the motor instruction tested: the response to color change was obtained about 80 ms later than both conditions involving location change. It is concluded that: (1) color processing is slower than location processing, and (2) the first reactions to the location change occur after the same delay irrespective of the response required from the subject.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9746133     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  11 in total

1.  Abstraction from a sensori-motor perspective: can we get a quick hold on simple perception?

Authors:  Yves Rossetti
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Colour vision can contribute to fast corrections of arm movements.

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Perceptual requirements for fast manual responses.

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Temporal and spatial constraints of action effect on sensory binding.

Authors:  Xavier Corveleyn; Joan Lopez-Moliner; Yann Coello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Preparation and inhibition of interceptive actions.

Authors:  Welber Marinovic; Annaliese M Plooy; James R Tresilian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Feature binding of a continuously changing object.

Authors:  Para Kang; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Grasping isoluminant stimuli.

Authors:  Urs Kleinholdermann; Volker H Franz; Karl R Gegenfurtner; Kerstin Stockmeier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Modifying one's hand's trajectory when a moving target's orientation changes.

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The latency for correcting a movement depends on the visual attribute that defines the target.

Authors:  Margot M Veerman; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  How moving backgrounds influence interception.

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.