Tactile impairments cannot explain the effect of age on a grasp and lift task.

This experiment addressed the often-posed theory that age-related declines in manual dexterity result from diminished tactile function. We measured the time 'young' subjects (n=33; mean=45 years) and 'old' subjects (n=33; mean=74 years) needed to grip (thumb and index finger), lift, and transport a small metal sphere when vision was permitted and when blindfolded. Subjects began each trial by reaching for the sphere and were instructed to complete the entire task quickly. In the absence of visual information, placement of the finger and thumb for a secure grip and lift cannot be performed efficiently without tactile information. If age-related tactile changes are functionally significant for this task, then without visual information the 'old' group should show a disproportionate increase in the duration of the grip and lift phase of the task compared to the 'young' group. Perceptual thresholds for tactile pressure stimuli (Semmes-Weinstein filaments) confirmed well-known age-related changes. Age and vision effects were manifest mainly during the grip-lift phase (time from object contact to lift-off from its support surface), with the expected finding that the 'old' group required more time than 'young' group, regardless of visual condition. The main finding was that the 'grip-lift' duration in the 'no-vision' condition was about twice the duration observed in the 'vision' condition for both age groups (ratios of 2.1 and 2.3 for 'young' and 'old', respectively). This similar relative slowing for the two groups fails to support the hypothesis that old adults' ability to grip and lift the object was limited by changes in the availability or use of tactile information.