Literature DB >> 9745397

Octreotide as primary therapy for acromegaly.

C B Newman1, S Melmed, A George, D Torigian, M Duhaney, P Snyder, W Young, A Klibanski, M E Molitch, R Gagel, L Sheeler, D Cook, W Malarkey, I Jackson, M L Vance, A Barkan, L Frohman, D L Kleinberg.   

Abstract

The effects of octreotide (up to 5 yr) as primary treatment in 26 patients with acromegaly were compared with those in 81 patients with acromegaly who received octreotide as secondary or adjunctive therapy after previous surgery and/or pituitary radiation. These patients were part of a multicenter study that took place between 1989-1995. The study was divided into 3 phases beginning with a 1-month placebo-controlled treatment period followed by a 1-month washout period. In the second phase, patients were randomized to treatment with either 100 or 250 micrograms octreotide, sc, every 8 h for 6 months. Octreotide was then discontinued for 1 month and reinitiated at the lower dose for a total mean treatment duration of 39 months. The dose was titrated by each investigator to improve each patient's individual response, which included improvement in symptoms and signs of acromegaly as well as reduction of GH and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) into the normal range. In the second phase of the study, in which patients were randomized to either 100 or 250 micrograms octreotide, three times daily, mean integrated GH and IGF-I concentrations after 3 and 6 months were equivalent in the primary and secondary treatment groups. During long term open label treatment, mean GH fell from 32.7 +/- 5.2 to 6.0 +/- 1.7 micrograms/L 2 h after octreotide injection in the primary therapy group and remained suppressed for a mean period of 24 months (range, 3-60 months). The mean final daily dose was 777 micrograms. In the patients receiving secondary treatment, mean GH fell from 30.2 +/- 7.6 to 5.6 +/- 1.1 micrograms/L after 3 months and remained suppressed for the remainder of the study (average dose, 635 micrograms daily). Mean IGF-I concentrations fell from 5.2 +/- 0.5 x 10(3) U/L (primary treatment group) and 4.7 +/- 0.4 x 10(3) U/L (secondary treatment group) to a mean of 2.2 +/- 0.3 x 10(3) U/L in both groups after 3 months of open label treatment and remained suppressed. IGF-I was reduced into the normal range during at least half of the study visits in 68% of the primary treatment group and in 62% of the secondary treatment group. Patients whose GH levels fell to at least 2 SD below the baseline mean GH were considered responders. There was no significant difference in the percentage of responders in the primary and secondary treatment groups (70% vs. 61%), nor was there a statistical difference in the mean GH concentrations between the groups. Symptoms of headache, increased perspiration, fatigue, and joint pain were reported at baseline by 46%, 73%, 69%, and 85%, respectively, of patients in the primary therapy group and improved during 3 yr of octreotide treatment in 50-100%. Similarly, these acromegaly-related symptoms were reported by 62%, 58%, 78%, and 60% of patients in the secondary therapy group, and improvement was noted in 62-88%. Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging scans were available in 13 of 26 patients in the primary treatment group before and after 6 months of octreotide treatment. Tumor shrinkage was observed in 6 of 13 patients, with reduction in tumor volume greater than 25% in only 3. Of 6 patients with documented tumor shrinkage, IGF-I was reduced into the normal range in 4 patients. Of the 7 remaining patients in whom tumor shrinkage was less than 10%, IGF-I was reduced into the normal range in 4 patients. Of the 7 remaining patients in whom tumor shrinkage was less than 10%, IGF-I was reduced into the normal range in 5 patients. The degree of tumor shrinkage did not correlate with the percent reduction in IGF-I or GH. In summary, octreotide was equally effective in 26 previously untreated acromegalic patients (primary treatment group) and 81 patients previously treated with either surgery or pituitary radiation (secondary treatment group). These observations call into question the current practice of surgical resection of all newly diagnosed GH-secreting pituitary adenomas regardless of the likelihood of cure. (AB

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9745397     DOI: 10.1210/jcem.83.9.5109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  58 in total

Review 1.  Role of gamma knife radiosurgery in acromegaly.

Authors:  I M Jackson; G Noren
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 2.  Evolving therapeutic strategies for acromegaly.

Authors:  K H Darzy; S M Shalet
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 3.  Growth hormone and its disorders.

Authors:  J Ayuk; M C Sheppard
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 4.  Primary therapy for acromegaly with somatostatin analogs and a discussion of novel peptide analogs.

Authors:  David L Kleinberg
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.514

5.  Dramatic volume reduction of a large GH/TSH secreting pituitary tumor with short term Octreotide therapy.

Authors:  John L D Atkinson; Charles F Abboud; John I Lane
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 6.  Treatment of acromegaly: future.

Authors:  Ines Donangelo; Shlomo Melmed
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 7.  Effects of lanreotide SR and Autogel on tumor mass in patients with acromegaly: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gherardo Mazziotti; Andrea Giustina
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 8.  Acromegaly.

Authors:  Massimo Scacchi; Francesco Cavagnini
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 9.  Guidelines for the treatment of growth hormone excess and growth hormone deficiency in adults.

Authors:  A Giustina; A Barkan; P Chanson; A Grossman; A Hoffman; E Ghigo; F Casanueva; A Colao; S Lamberts; M Sheppard; S Melmed
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.256

10.  Effectiveness of self- or partner-administration of an extended-release aqueous-gel formulation of lanreotide in lanreotide-naïve patients with acromegaly.

Authors:  Roberto Salvatori; Lisa B Nachtigall; David M Cook; Vivien Bonert; Mark E Molitch; Sandra Blethen; Stephen Chang
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.