UNLABELLED: The DNA topoisomerases I and II are the target of several clinically important antineoplastic agents which produce DNA cleavage by stabilization of the covalent DNA-protein bond with resultant cell death after DNA synthesis is attempted. Depletion of the target topoisomerase and reciprocal changes in the other occur with drug treatment. PURPOSE AND METHODS: To develop empiric treatment regimens of combinations and sequences of agents directed against topoisomerase I (irinotecan/CPT-11) and II (etoposide and doxorubicin), in vivo studies were performed in mice bearing the EMT-6 mammary tumor to assess efficacy, host tolerance and the resultant biochemical changes in topoisomerase mRNA and protein. RESULTS: At 24 h after therapy, depletion of the target topoisomerase mRNA and protein with reciprocal increases in the alternate topoisomerase mRNA and, to a lesser extent, protein were noted. No therapeutic antagonism was found with any combination or sequence of agents, and therapeutic antagonism was noted with concurrent irinotecan/etoposide and sequential doxorubicin/irinotecan. Depletion of target topoisomerases by combined therapy beyond a threshold necessary for therapeutic efficacy produced no additional benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Antineoplastic therapy with combinations of topoisomerase I and II agents is feasible and may produce therapeutic synergy. The appropriate sequence may depend on the particular agents used. The rationale for such therapy, that topoisomerases I and II may have reciprocal and compensatory interactions, is supported by the biochemical data.
UNLABELLED: The DNA topoisomerases I and II are the target of several clinically important antineoplastic agents which produce DNA cleavage by stabilization of the covalent DNA-protein bond with resultant cell death after DNA synthesis is attempted. Depletion of the target topoisomerase and reciprocal changes in the other occur with drug treatment. PURPOSE AND METHODS: To develop empiric treatment regimens of combinations and sequences of agents directed against topoisomerase I (irinotecan/CPT-11) and II (etoposide and doxorubicin), in vivo studies were performed in mice bearing the EMT-6 mammary tumor to assess efficacy, host tolerance and the resultant biochemical changes in topoisomerase mRNA and protein. RESULTS: At 24 h after therapy, depletion of the target topoisomerase mRNA and protein with reciprocal increases in the alternate topoisomerase mRNA and, to a lesser extent, protein were noted. No therapeutic antagonism was found with any combination or sequence of agents, and therapeutic antagonism was noted with concurrent irinotecan/etoposide and sequential doxorubicin/irinotecan. Depletion of target topoisomerases by combined therapy beyond a threshold necessary for therapeutic efficacy produced no additional benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Antineoplastic therapy with combinations of topoisomerase I and II agents is feasible and may produce therapeutic synergy. The appropriate sequence may depend on the particular agents used. The rationale for such therapy, that topoisomerases I and II may have reciprocal and compensatory interactions, is supported by the biochemical data.
Authors: Yoji Yamashita; Michal T Krauze; Tomohiro Kawaguchi; Charles O Noble; Daryl C Drummond; John W Park; Krystof S Bankiewicz Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2006-10-03 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Nancy L Bartlett; Jeffrey L Johnson; Nina Wagner-Johnston; Mark J Ratain; Bruce A Peterson Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2008-07-23 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Vinicius Ernani; Rahat Jahan; Lynette M Smith; Alissa S Marr; Sarah E Kimbrough; Mary E Kos; Jolene Tijerina; Shannon Pivovar; Imayavaramban Lakshmanan; Marsha Ketcham; Sanchita Rauth; Kavita Mallya; Mohd W Nasser; Maneesh Jain; Anne Kessinger; Surinder K Batra; Apar Kishor Ganti Journal: Cancer Treat Res Commun Date: 2019-10-07
Authors: Christopher H Stuart; David A Horita; Michael J Thomas; Freddie R Salsbury; Mark O Lively; William H Gmeiner Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2014-02-06 Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: R T Penson; M V Seiden; U A Matulonis; L J Appleman; A F Fuller; A Goodman; S M Campos; J W Clark; M Roche; J P Eder Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2005-07-11 Impact factor: 7.640