BACKGROUND: Historically, total laryngectomy with voice-prosthesis insertion and near-total laryngectomy were the surgical options advocated for advanced supraglottic and transglottic tumors classified as T3-T4. METHODS: The present retrospective study reviewed our experience with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and supracricoid partial laryngectomy with cricohyoidopexy (SCPL-CHP) in a series of 60 patients with an isolated, untreated, advanced supraglottic/transglottic invasive squamous cell carcinoma classified as T3-T4. RESULTS: The Kaplan-Meier 5-year actuarial survival, local failure, nodal failure, and distant metastasis estimates were 72.7%, 8.3%, 9.2%, and 9.8%, respectively. Survival was significantly reduced in patients with nodal failure (p = .001) and distant metastasis (p = .007). Overall, a 91.7% laryngeal preservation rate and a 98.3% local control rate were achieved. CONCLUSION: Our report was a retrospective analysis and did not present a control group exclusively managed with SCPL-CHP. Therefore, we were unable to demonstrate that the use of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy prior to SCPL-CHP allowed for an increase in local control, laryngeal preservation, and survival. However, the use of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy allowed for remobilization of a fixed arytenoid cartilage in 10 patients who thus became amenable to SCPL-CHP. The key role of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in this series was as a prognostic indicator for suitability for SCPL-CHP in the case of supraglottic-transglottic tumor with arytenoid cartilage fixation. Our data also supported the notion that SCPL-CHP is a valid alternative to total laryngectomy with voice prosthesis insertion and near-total laryngectomy in selected patients with a previously untreated supraglottic/transglottic invasive squamous cell carcinoma classified as T3-T4. Furthermore, the successful use (in terms of surgical outcome, laryngeal preservation, and survival) of SCPL-CHP after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy suggested that laryngeal organ-preservation strategies, in advanced endolaryngeal transglottic and/or supraglottic invasive squamous cell carcinoma, should not be limited to the use of laryngeal radiotherapy after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.
BACKGROUND: Historically, total laryngectomy with voice-prosthesis insertion and near-total laryngectomy were the surgical options advocated for advanced supraglottic and transglottic tumors classified as T3-T4. METHODS: The present retrospective study reviewed our experience with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and supracricoid partial laryngectomy with cricohyoidopexy (SCPL-CHP) in a series of 60 patients with an isolated, untreated, advanced supraglottic/transglottic invasive squamous cell carcinoma classified as T3-T4. RESULTS: The Kaplan-Meier 5-year actuarial survival, local failure, nodal failure, and distant metastasis estimates were 72.7%, 8.3%, 9.2%, and 9.8%, respectively. Survival was significantly reduced in patients with nodal failure (p = .001) and distant metastasis (p = .007). Overall, a 91.7% laryngeal preservation rate and a 98.3% local control rate were achieved. CONCLUSION: Our report was a retrospective analysis and did not present a control group exclusively managed with SCPL-CHP. Therefore, we were unable to demonstrate that the use of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy prior to SCPL-CHP allowed for an increase in local control, laryngeal preservation, and survival. However, the use of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy allowed for remobilization of a fixed arytenoid cartilage in 10 patients who thus became amenable to SCPL-CHP. The key role of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in this series was as a prognostic indicator for suitability for SCPL-CHP in the case of supraglottic-transglottic tumor with arytenoid cartilage fixation. Our data also supported the notion that SCPL-CHP is a valid alternative to total laryngectomy with voice prosthesis insertion and near-total laryngectomy in selected patients with a previously untreated supraglottic/transglottic invasive squamous cell carcinoma classified as T3-T4. Furthermore, the successful use (in terms of surgical outcome, laryngeal preservation, and survival) of SCPL-CHP after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy suggested that laryngeal organ-preservation strategies, in advanced endolaryngeal transglottic and/or supraglottic invasive squamous cell carcinoma, should not be limited to the use of laryngeal radiotherapy after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.
Authors: E Crosetti; P Garofalo; C Bosio; P Consolino; A Petrelli; G Rizzotto; G Succo Journal: Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 2.124
Authors: G Succo; M Bussi; L Presutti; S Cirillo; E Crosetti; A Bertolin; L Giordano; G Molteni; M Petracchini; A E Sprio; G N Berta; A Fornari; G Rizzotto Journal: Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 2.124
Authors: Martin Canis; Friedrich Ihler; Alexios Martin; Hendrik A Wolff; Christoph Matthias; Wolfgang Steiner Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2013-02-14 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: L Giordano; D Di Santo; E Crosetti; A Bertolin; G Rizzotto; G Succo; M Bussi Journal: Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 2.124