Literature DB >> 9744394

Relationship between nodal stage and the number of dissected perigastric nodes in gastric cancer.

T Ichikura1, Y Furuya, S Tomimatsu, Y Okusa, T Ogawa, K Mukoda, H Mochizuki, S Tamakuma.   

Abstract

To evaluate the rationality of the current nodal staging system in gastric cancer, we retrospectively analyzed 152 patients with perigastric node involvement localized to a single station, in whom the route of metastasis to distant nodes was limited. No significant differences in pathology or survival were observed between patients with stage n1 and those with stage n2-3 nodal involvement, but the mean (standard deviation) number of perigastric nodes dissected was 22.6 (12.6) in those with stage nl involvement and 18.5 (9.5) in those with stage n2-3 involvement (P = 0.04). When perigastric node involvement was localized to station 3, the mean number of dissected station 3 nodes was 7.7 (4.2) in nl patients and 5.3 (2.8) in n2-3 patients (P = 0.04). This tendency was also observed in patients with perigastric node involvement limited to either station 1 (P = 0.08) or station 6 (P = 0.11). Thus, patients with fewer perigastric nodes may have more lymphatics that bypass perigastric nodes and empty directly into distant nodes, increasing the likelihood of skip metastases. The number of positive nodes, affected to a lesser degree by lymphatic distribution than the location of positive nodes, should be incorporated into the staging criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9744394     DOI: 10.1007/s005950050246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  7 in total

1.  Patho-anatomical demonstration of lymph node metastases in a surgical specimen.

Authors:  P Schmitz-Moormann; C Thomas; C Pohl; R Söhl
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.250

2.  Clearance technique for the detection of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  S J Cawthorn; N M Gibbs; C G Marks
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  [Studies on gastric lymphatics by using activated carbon particle (CH44) and lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer].

Authors:  K Yoshida; K Ohta; I Ohhashi; T Nakajima; K Takagi; M Nishi
Journal:  Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1988-05

4.  Lymph node counts in the upper abdomen: anatomical basis for lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer.

Authors:  P K Wagner; A Ramaswamy; J Rüschoff; P Schmitz-Moormann; M Rothmund
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Comparison of the prognostic significance between the number of metastatic lymph nodes and nodal stage based on their location in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  T Ichikura; S Tomimatsu; Y Okusa; K Uefuji; S Tamakuma
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Number and size of perigastric lymph nodes in human adults without gastric cancer.

Authors:  F Borchard; P Betz
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Detection of lymph node metastases in colorectal carcinoma before and after fat clearance.

Authors:  K W Scott; R H Grace
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 6.939

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Validity of modified gastrectomy combined with sentinel node navigation surgery for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hironori Ohdaira; Hiroshi Nimura; Norio Mitsumori; Naoto Takahashi; Hideyuki Kashiwagi; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Relationship between lymph node sinuses with blood and lymphatic metastasis of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Tong Yin; Xiao-Long Ji; Min-Shi Shen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.742

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.