Literature DB >> 9744203

Focus group interviews examining attitudes to randomised trials among breast cancer patients and the general community.

P M Ellis1, P N Butow.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the knowledge of, and attitudes towards, randomised clinical trials among women in the community and breast cancer patients.
DESIGN: Focus group interviews were conducted with women in the community and women previously treated for localised breast cancer. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty one mothers or grandmothers of children attending a local primary school and 20 breast cancer patients identified from the records of the Medical Oncology Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, participated in one of eight focus group discussions examining knowledge of and attitudes towards randomised clinical trials.
RESULTS: Most women did not have a good understanding of the need for clinical trials and the manner and safeguards with which they are conducted. They did not understand the need for randomisation and were often confused about the use of placebos. Many women were wary about medical research and saw it as a gamble, only to be considered if all else failed. Clinical trials were felt to be of benefit to future generations and perhaps family members if they should fall ill. However, they were not thought to be of benefit to the individual patient.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that greater community awareness of clinical trials is needed to improve participation in clinical trials. These focus group findings require validation in a larger sample.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9744203     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1998.tb01432.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health        ISSN: 1326-0200            Impact factor:   2.939


  14 in total

1.  Scientific tools, fake treatments, or triggers for psychological healing: how clinical trial participants conceptualise placebos.

Authors:  Felicity L Bishop; Eric E Jacobson; Jessica R Shaw; Ted J Kaptchuk
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  Cancer patient decision making related to clinical trial participation: an integrative review with implications for patients' relational autonomy.

Authors:  Jennifer A H Bell; Lynda G Balneaves
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-01-17       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Patients' attitudes and perceptions regarding research and their rights: a pilot survey study from the Middle East.

Authors:  Tamer Hifnawy; Samer Kobrosly; Hillary Edwards; Manal Anwar; Dalia Zahran; Henry Silverman
Journal:  East Mediterr Health J       Date:  2017-08-27       Impact factor: 1.628

4.  Attitudes of dental patients towards participation in research.

Authors:  S Al-Amad; M Awad; H Silverman
Journal:  East Mediterr Health J       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 1.628

5.  Informed consent and placebo effects: a content analysis of information leaflets to identify what clinical trial participants are told about placebos.

Authors:  Felicity L Bishop; Alison E M Adams; Ted J Kaptchuk; George T Lewith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Attitudes of the Japanese public and doctors towards use of archived information and samples without informed consent: preliminary findings based on focus group interviews.

Authors:  Atsushi Asai; Motoki Ohnishi; Etsuyo Nishigaki; Miho Sekimoto; Shunichi Fukuhara; Tsuguya Fukui
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2002-01-09       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Reasons for accepting or declining to participate in randomized clinical trials for cancer therapy.

Authors:  V Jenkins; L Fallowfield
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Knowledge and attitudes regarding medical research studies among patients with breast cancer and gynecological diseases.

Authors:  Michael P Lux; Thomas Hildebrandt; Sandra-Maria Knetzger; Michael G Schrauder; Sebastian M Jud; Alexander Hein; Claudia Rauh; Peter A Fasching; Matthias W Beckmann; Falk C Thiel
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  The Patient Deficit Model Overturned: a qualitative study of patients' perceptions of invitation to participate in a randomized controlled trial comparing selective bladder preservation against surgery in muscle invasive bladder cancer (SPARE, CRUK/07/011).

Authors:  Clare Moynihan; Rebecca Lewis; Emma Hall; Emma Jones; Alison Birtle; Robert Huddart
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Attitudes, understanding, and concerns regarding medical research amongst Egyptians: a qualitative pilot study.

Authors:  Susan S Khalil; Henry J Silverman; May Raafat; Samer El-Kamary; Maged El-Setouhy
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.