Literature DB >> 9743309

Four cycles of BEP vs four cycles of VIP in patients with intermediate-prognosis metastatic testicular non-seminoma: a randomized study of the EORTC Genitourinary Tract Cancer Cooperative Group. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

R de Wit1, G Stoter, D T Sleijfer, J P Neijt, W W ten Bokkel Huinink, L de Prijck, L Collette, R Sylvester.   

Abstract

We investigated the efficacy and toxicity of induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide with either bleomycin or ifosfamide in patients with intermediate-prognosis testicular non-seminoma. A total of 84 eligible patients were randomized to receive four cycles of etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin (VIP), or four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin (BEP). Intermediate prognosis was defined as any of the following: lymph node metastases 5-10 cm in diameter, lung metastases more than four in number or > 3 cm, HCG 5000-50,000 IU l(-1), AFP > 1000 IU l(-1). The complete response (CR) rates to VIP and BEP were similar, 74% and 79% respectively (P = 0.62). Including the cases in whom viable cancer was completely resected with post-chemotherapy debulking surgery, the percentages of patients who achieved a no-evidence-of-disease status were 80% on VIP and 82% on BEP (P = 0.99). In addition, there were no differences in relapse rate, disease-free and overall survival after a median follow-up of 7.7 years. The 5-year progression-free survival was 85% (95% CI 74-96%) in the VIP arm and 83% (95% CI 71-96%) in the BEP arm, hazard ratio (VIP/BEP) 0.83 (95% CI 0.30-2.28). The VIP regimen was more toxic with regard to bone marrow function; the frequency of leucocytes below 2000 microl(-1) throughout four cycles was 89% on VIP and 37% on BEP (P < 0.001). Our study does not indicate that ifosfamide is superior to bleomycin in combination with cisplatin and etoposide. The sample size in this study is small as the study was prematurely discontinued when data became available from a competing study that showed no improved effectiveness of VIP compared with BEP. Taken together with these data, bleomycin should not be replaced by conventional-dose ifosfamide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9743309      PMCID: PMC2062963          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  9 in total

1.  Randomized comparison of cisplatin and etoposide and either bleomycin or ifosfamide in treatment of advanced disseminated germ cell tumors: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Southwest Oncology Group, and Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study.

Authors:  C R Nichols; P J Catalano; E D Crawford; N J Vogelzang; L H Einhorn; P J Loehrer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  The role of ifosfamide plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy as salvage therapy for patients with refractory germ cell tumors.

Authors:  R J Motzer; K Cooper; N L Geller; D F Bajorin; E Dmitrovsky; H Herr; M Morse; W Fair; P Sogani; P Russo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Intensive induction-sequential chemotherapy with BOP/VIP-B compared with treatment with BEP/EP for poor-prognosis metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumor: a Randomized Medical Research Council/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer study.

Authors:  S B Kaye; G M Mead; S Fossa; M Cullen; R deWit; I Bodrogi; C van Groeningen; R Sylvester; L Collette; S Stenning; L De Prijck; E Lallemand; P deMulder
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Ifosfamide- and cisplatin-containing chemotherapy as first-line salvage therapy in germ cell tumors: response and survival.

Authors:  J A McCaffrey; M Mazumdar; D F Bajorin; G J Bosl; V Vlamis; R J Motzer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Treatment of testicular cancer: a new and improved model.

Authors:  L H Einhorn
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Testicular cancer as a model for a curable neoplasm: The Richard and Hinda Rosenthal Foundation Award Lecture.

Authors:  L H Einhorn
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Chemotherapy of disseminated testicular cancer. A random prospective study.

Authors:  L H Einhorn; S D Williams
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1980-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  The Second Medical Research Council study of prognostic factors in nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. Medical Research Council Testicular Tumour Working Party.

Authors:  G M Mead; S P Stenning; M C Parkinson; A Horwich; S D Fossa; P M Wilkinson; S B Kaye; E S Newlands; P A Cook
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in patients with disseminated nonseminomatous testicular cancer: results from a European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer Multiinstitutional Phase III Study.

Authors:  G Stoter; R Sylvester; D T Sleijfer; W W ten Bokkel Huinink; S B Kaye; W G Jones; A T van Oosterom; C P Vendrik; P Spaander; M de Pauw
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1987-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

  9 in total
  28 in total

Review 1.  Comparative tolerability of chemotherapy regimens for germ cell cancer.

Authors:  S Culine; J P Droz
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Advances in the treatment of testicular cancer.

Authors:  Hans-Georg Kopp; Markus Kuczyk; Johannes Classen; Arnulf Stenzl; Lothar Kanz; Frank Mayer; Michael Bamberg; Jörg Thomas Hartmann
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Canadian consensus guidelines for the management of testicular germ cell cancer.

Authors:  Lori Wood; Christian Kollmannsberger; Michael Jewett; Peter Chung; Sebastian Hotte; Martin O'Malley; Joan Sweet; Lynn Anson-Cartwright; Eric Winquist; Scott North; Scott Tyldesley; Jeremy Sturgeon; Mary Gospodarowicz; Roanne Segal; Tina Cheng; Peter Venner; Malcolm Moore; Peter Albers; Robert Huddart; Craig Nichols; Padraig Warde
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  A review of second-line chemotherapy and prognostic models for disseminated germ cell tumors.

Authors:  Martin H Voss; Darren R Feldman; George J Bosl; Robert J Motzer
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 3.722

Review 5.  Systemic therapy for primary and extragonadal germ cell tumors: prognosis and nuances of treatment.

Authors:  Bilal A Siddiqui; Miao Zhang; Louis L Pisters; Shi-Ming Tu
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-01

Review 6.  Surgical salvage in patients with advanced testicular cancer: indications, risks and outcomes.

Authors:  Ryan W Speir; Clint Cary; Timothy A Masterson
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-01

7.  [Inductive systemic therapy of urological tumors with curative intent].

Authors:  F vom Dorp; S Krege; H Rübben
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Update on management of seminoma.

Authors:  Emma J Alexander; Ingrid M White; Alan Horwich
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar

9.  Management of poor-prognosis testicular germ cell tumors.

Authors:  Kiranpreet Khurana; Timothy D Gilligan; Andrew J Stephenson
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar

10.  Alternating dose-dense chemotherapy in patients with high volume disseminated non-seminomatous germ cell tumours.

Authors:  K Fizazi; D M Prow; K-A Do; X Wang; L Finn; J Kim; D Daliani; C N Papandreou; S-M Tu; R E Millikan; L C Pagliaro; C J Logothetis; R J Amato
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-05-20       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.