Literature DB >> 9741853

Sample size in clinical trials with dichotomous endpoints: use of covariables.

S C Choi1.   

Abstract

In many clinical trials, the primary endpoint is dichotomous. In this article, we examine the possibility of reducing the required sample size by removing variation associated with baseline covariables. Three measures are used to study the size of the reduction. Simulation studies based on a database of head trauma and of stroke patients suggested that a substantial reduction in the sample size can be achieved when the correlation between the endpoint and covariables is strong. A simple ad hoc formula for approximating the required sample size is proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9741853     DOI: 10.1080/10543409808835246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biopharm Stat        ISSN: 1054-3406            Impact factor:   1.051


  5 in total

1.  Predicting major outcomes in type 1 diabetes: a model development and validation study.

Authors:  Sabita S Soedamah-Muthu; Yvonne Vergouwe; Tina Costacou; Rachel G Miller; Janice Zgibor; Nish Chaturvedi; Janet K Snell-Bergeon; David M Maahs; Marian Rewers; Carol Forsblom; Valma Harjutsalo; Per-Henrik Groop; John H Fuller; Karel G M Moons; Trevor J Orchard
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  Predictors of acamprosate efficacy: results from a pooled analysis of seven European trials including 1485 alcohol-dependent patients.

Authors:  Roel Verheul; Philippe Lehert; Peter J Geerlings; Maarten W J Koeter; Wim van den Brink
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Are unadjusted analyses of clinical trials inappropriately biased toward the null?

Authors:  David M Kent; Thomas A Trikalinos; Michael D Hill
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  The effect of covariate adjustment for baseline severity in acute stroke clinical trials with responder analysis outcomes.

Authors:  Kyra M Garofolo; Sharon D Yeatts; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Edward C Jauch; Karen C Johnston; Valerie L Durkalski
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Nino Mushkudiani; Pablo Perel; Isabella Butcher; Juan Lu; Gillian S McHugh; Gordon D Murray; Anthony Marmarou; Ian Roberts; J Dik F Habbema; Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 11.069

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.