UNLABELLED: Previously, this laboratory has demonstrated that exhaustive aerobic exercise performance is not subject to significant chronobiological variation between 0800 and 2000 h, but certain physiological responses to maximal aerobic effort do fluctuate significantly within that time frame. PURPOSE: The purpose of the present investigation was to determine whether muscle performance, and selected physiological responses to resistance exercise, was significantly influenced by time of day effects. METHODS:Ten healthy, but untrained, men (21.1+/-0.6 yr, mean +/- SE) volunteered to participate in the study. In a balanced and randomized study design, each subject performed resistance exercise protocols on an isokinetic dynamometer with maximal effort at 0800 h, 1200 h, 1600 h, and 2000 h. Selected physiological and hormonal data were recorded before and immediately following the exercise stimulus. RESULTS: The data demonstrated significant chronobiological oscillation in peak torque, average power, maximal work in a single repetition, and total work per set. Interestingly, this oscillation was manifested only at the fastest velocities of limb movement utilized. Pre- and postexercise rectal temperature exhibited significant time of day fluctuation, as did postexercise blood pressure. Plasma levels of testosterone and cortisol also displayed significant biorhythmicity under both pre- and postexercise conditions. However, exercise-induced responses (pre- to postexercise differences) of those steroid hormones did not exhibit significant biorythmic variation. Although plasma concentrations of both testosterone and cortisol were highest at 0800 h, testosterone to cortisol ratios were greatest at 2000 h. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, these data suggest that maximal muscle performance does vary within the segment of the day when exercise typically occurs (0800-2000 h) but that this variation is specific to speed of movement.
RCT Entities:
UNLABELLED: Previously, this laboratory has demonstrated that exhaustive aerobic exercise performance is not subject to significant chronobiological variation between 0800 and 2000 h, but certain physiological responses to maximal aerobic effort do fluctuate significantly within that time frame. PURPOSE: The purpose of the present investigation was to determine whether muscle performance, and selected physiological responses to resistance exercise, was significantly influenced by time of day effects. METHODS: Ten healthy, but untrained, men (21.1+/-0.6 yr, mean +/- SE) volunteered to participate in the study. In a balanced and randomized study design, each subject performed resistance exercise protocols on an isokinetic dynamometer with maximal effort at 0800 h, 1200 h, 1600 h, and 2000 h. Selected physiological and hormonal data were recorded before and immediately following the exercise stimulus. RESULTS: The data demonstrated significant chronobiological oscillation in peak torque, average power, maximal work in a single repetition, and total work per set. Interestingly, this oscillation was manifested only at the fastest velocities of limb movement utilized. Pre- and postexercise rectal temperature exhibited significant time of day fluctuation, as did postexercise blood pressure. Plasma levels of testosterone and cortisol also displayed significant biorhythmicity under both pre- and postexercise conditions. However, exercise-induced responses (pre- to postexercise differences) of those steroid hormones did not exhibit significant biorythmic variation. Although plasma concentrations of both testosterone and cortisol were highest at 0800 h, testosterone to cortisol ratios were greatest at 2000 h. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, these data suggest that maximal muscle performance does vary within the segment of the day when exercise typically occurs (0800-2000 h) but that this variation is specific to speed of movement.
Authors: Sarah Forbes-Robertson; Edward Dudley; Pankaj Vadgama; Christian Cook; Scott Drawer; Liam Kilduff Journal: Sports Med Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: François Cottin; Jean Slawinski; Philippe Lopes; Andry Van de Louw; Véronique Billat Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2006-11-18 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Matthew S Ganio; R Matthew Brothers; Shigeki Shibata; Jeffrey L Hastings; Craig G Crandall Journal: Exp Physiol Date: 2011-06-17 Impact factor: 2.969