Literature DB >> 9741522

Improved left ventricular endocardial border delineation and opacification with OPTISON (FS069), a new echocardiographic contrast agent. Results of a phase III Multicenter Trial.

J L Cohen1, J Cheirif, D S Segar, L D Gillam, J S Gottdiener, E Hausnerova, D E Bruns.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The echocardiographic contrast-enhancing effects and safety profile of ALBUNEX (a suspension of air-filled albumin microspheres) were compared with the new contrast agent OPTISON (formerly FS069: a suspension of albumin microspheres containing the gas perfluoropropane) in 203 patients with inadequate noncontrast echocardiograms.
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of ALBUNEX has been limited by its short duration of action. By using perfluoropropane instead of air within the microsphere, its duration of action is increased.
METHODS: Each patient received ALBUNEX (0.8 and 0.22 mL/kg) and OPTISON (0.2, 0.5, 3.0, and 5.0 mL) on separate days a minimum of 48 hours apart. Echocardiograms were evaluated for increase in left ventricular (LV) endocardial border length, degree of LV opacification, number of LV endocardial border segments visualized, conversion from a nondiagnostic to a diagnostic echocardiogram, and duration of contrast enhancement. A thorough safety evaluation was conducted.
RESULTS: Compared with ALBUNEX, OPTISON more significantly improved every measure of contrast enhancement. OPTISON increased well-visualized LV endocardial border length by 6.0+/-5.1, 6.9+/-5.4, 7.5+/-4.7, and 7.6+/-4.8 cm, respectively, for each of the four doses, compared with only 2.2+/-4.5 and 3.4+/-4.6 cm, respectively, for the two ALBUNEX doses (p < 0.001). 100% LV opacification was achieved in 61%, 73%, 87%, and 87% of the patients with the four doses of OPTISON, but in only 16% and 36% of the patients with the two ALBUNEX doses (p < 0.001). Conversion of nondiagnostic to diagnostic echocardiograms with contrast occurred in 74% of patients with the optimal dose of OPTISON (3.0 mL) compared with only 26% with the optimal dose of ALBUNEX (0.22 mL/kg) (p < 0.001). The duration of contrast effect was also significantly greater with OPTISON than with ALBUNEX. In a subset of patients with potentially poor transpulmonary transit of contrast (patients with chronic lung disease or dilated cardiomyopathy), OPTISON more significantly improved the same measures of contrast enhancement compared with ALBUNEX and did so to the same extent as in the overall population. Side effects were similar and transient with the two agents.
CONCLUSION: OPTISON appears to be a safe, well-tolerated echocardiographic contrast agent that is superior to ALBUNEX.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9741522     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00311-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  43 in total

Review 1.  Clinical and economic outcomes assessment with myocardial contrast echocardiography.

Authors:  L J Shaw; M J Monaghan; P Nihoyannopolous
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Microbubble contrast agents: a new era in ultrasound.

Authors:  M J Blomley; J C Cooke; E C Unger; M J Monaghan; D O Cosgrove
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-19

3.  Vascular lesions and s-thrombomodulin concentrations from auricular arteries of rabbits infused with microbubble contrast agent and exposed to pulsed ultrasound.

Authors:  James F Zachary; James P Blue; Rita J Miller; William D O'Brien
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  BSE procedure guidelines for the clinical application of stress echocardiography, recommendations for performance and interpretation of stress echocardiography: a report of the British Society of Echocardiography Policy Committee.

Authors:  H Becher; J Chambers; K Fox; R Jones; G J Leech; N Masani; M Monaghan; R More; P Nihoyannopoulos; H Rimington; R Senior; G Warton
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Safety of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Jarl A Jakobsen; Raymond Oyen; Henrik S Thomsen; Sameh K Morcos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Parametric harmonic-to-fundamental ratio contrast echocardiography: a novel approach to identification and accurate measurement of left ventricular area under variable levels of ultrasound signal attenuation.

Authors:  Shiro Yoshifuku; Shigao Chen; Eileen M McMahon; Akiko Yoshikawa; Partho P Sengupta; Josef Korinek; Marek Belohlavek
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 2.890

7.  Impact of Contrast Echocardiography on Assessment of Ventricular Function and Clinical Diagnosis in Routine Clinical Echocardiography: Korean Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Doo-Youp Kim; Jung-Hyun Choi; Geu-Ru Hong; Se-Joong Rim; Jang-Young Kim; Sang-Chol Lee; Il-Suk Sohn; Wook-Jin Chung; Hye-Sun Seo; Se-Jung Yoon; Kyoung-Im Cho; Si-Wan Choi; Kyung-Jin Lee
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2017-03-27

8.  Contrast-enhanced versus non-enhanced three-dimensional echocardiography of left ventricular volumes.

Authors:  J A van der Heide; H F J Mannaerts; L Yang; G T Sieswerda; C A Visser; O Kamp
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  [Contrast echocardiography for detection of incomplete rupture of the left ventricle after acute myocardial infarction].

Authors:  Ursula Maria Wilkenshoff; Angela Ale Abaei; Bettina Kuersten; Matthias Pauschinger; Peter Schwimmbeck; Roland Hetzer; Heinz-Peter Schultheiss
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2004-08

Review 10.  Liquid perfluorocarbons as contrast agents for ultrasonography and (19)F-MRI.

Authors:  Raquel Díaz-López; Nicolas Tsapis; Elias Fattal
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 4.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.