E M Pratt1, S H Niego, W S Agras. 1. Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine whether objective and subjective binges differ significantly from each other in relation to measures of psychopathology in a sample of women who meet DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for bulimia nervosa. METHOD: Baseline data from the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) were analyzed and the average of the sum of and the difference between objective and subjective binge episodes were converted to z scores. Regressions were run with other baseline measures including the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnosis of DSM-III-R (SCID) I and II disorders, EDE subscales, and psychological measures. RESULTS: We found no significant difference between the two types of binges on all but one measure, the "Can Do" subscale of the Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, in a regression with the z score of total binges. DISCUSSION: The lack of significant findings questions the diagnostic validity of the "large amount of food" criterion used to define binge eating in the DSM-IV.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine whether objective and subjective binges differ significantly from each other in relation to measures of psychopathology in a sample of women who meet DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for bulimia nervosa. METHOD: Baseline data from the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) were analyzed and the average of the sum of and the difference between objective and subjective binge episodes were converted to z scores. Regressions were run with other baseline measures including the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnosis of DSM-III-R (SCID) I and II disorders, EDE subscales, and psychological measures. RESULTS: We found no significant difference between the two types of binges on all but one measure, the "Can Do" subscale of the Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, in a regression with the z score of total binges. DISCUSSION: The lack of significant findings questions the diagnostic validity of the "large amount of food" criterion used to define binge eating in the DSM-IV.
Authors: Christina M Morgan; Susan Z Yanovski; Tuc T Nguyen; Jennifer McDuffie; Nancy G Sebring; Miguel R Jorge; Margaret Keil; Jack A Yanovski Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Andrea B Goldschmidt; Scott G Engel; Stephen A Wonderlich; Ross D Crosby; Carol B Peterson; Daniel Le Grange; Marian Tanofsky-Kraff; Li Cao; James E Mitchell Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2011-09-22 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Carol B Peterson; Sonja A Swanson; Scott J Crow; James E Mitchell; W Stewart Agras; Katherine A Halmi; Ross D Crosby; Stephen A Wonderlich; Kelly C Berg Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2012-03-12 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Shannon D Donofry; Kathryn A Roecklein; Kelly J Rohan; Jennifer E Wildes; Marissa L Kamarck Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2014-03-15 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Deborah R Glasofer; Marian Tanofsky-Kraff; Kamryn T Eddy; Susan Z Yanovski; Kelly R Theim; Margaret C Mirch; Samareh Ghorbani; Lisa M Ranzenhofer; David Haaga; Jack A Yanovski Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2006-06-25
Authors: Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft; Anna C Ciao; Erin C Accurso; Emily M Pisetsky; Carol B Peterson; Catherine E Byrne; Daniel Le Grange Journal: Eur Eat Disord Rev Date: 2014-05-23
Authors: Kerstin K Blomquist; Christina A Roberto; Rachel D Barnes; Marney A White; Robin M Masheb; Carlos M Grilo Journal: Psychol Assess Date: 2013-11-11
Authors: Kendrin R Sonneville; Nicholas J Horton; Nadia Micali; Ross D Crosby; Sonja A Swanson; Francesca Solmi; Alison E Field Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 16.193