Literature DB >> 9740625

Determinants of pulse pressure.

N Stergiopulos1, N Westerhof.   

Abstract

We have searched to define the major arterial parameters that determine aortic systolic (Ps) and diastolic (Pd) pressure in the dog. Measured aortic flows were used as input to the 2-element windkessel model of the arterial system, with peripheral resistance calculated as mean pressure divided by mean flow and total arterial compliance calculated from the decay time in diastole. The windkessel model yielded an aortic pressure wave from which we obtained the predicted systolic (Ps,wk) and diastolic (Pd,wk) pressures. These predicted pressures were compared with the measured systolic and diastolic pressures. The measurements and calculations were performed for 7 dogs under control conditions during aortic occlusion at 4 locations (the trifurcation, between the trifurcation and diaphragm, the diaphragm, and the proximal descending thoracic aorta) and during occlusion of both carotid arteries. Under all conditions studied, the predicted systolic and diastolic pressures matched the experimental ones very well: Ps,wk=(1.000+/-0.0055) Ps with r=0.958 and Pd,wk=(1.024+/-0.0035) Pd with r=0.995. Linear regression for pulse pressure (PP) resulted in PPwk=(0.99+/-0.016) PP with r=0.911. We found the accuracy of prediction equally good under control conditions and in the presence of aortic or carotid artery occlusion. Multiple regression between pulse pressure and arterial resistance and total arterial compliance yielded a poor regression constant (R2=0.19), suggesting that the 2 arterial parameters alone cannot explain pulse pressure and that flow is an important determinant as well. We conclude that for a given ejection pattern (aortic flow), 2 arterial parameters, total arterial resistance and total arterial compliance, are sufficient to accurately describe systolic and diastolic aortic pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9740625     DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.32.3.556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  18 in total

1.  A coupled experimental and computational approach to quantify deleterious hemodynamics, vascular alterations, and mechanisms of long-term morbidity in response to aortic coarctation.

Authors:  Arjun Menon; David C Wendell; Hongfeng Wang; Thomas J Eddinger; Jeffrey M Toth; Ronak J Dholakia; Paul M Larsen; Eric S Jensen; John F Ladisa
Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 1.950

2.  Non-dimensional physics of pulsatile cardiovascular networks and energy efficiency.

Authors:  Berk Yigit; Kerem Pekkan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Increasing pulse wave velocity in a realistic cardiovascular model does not increase pulse pressure with age.

Authors:  Mohammad W Mohiuddin; Ryan J Rihani; Glen A Laine; Christopher M Quick
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 4.733

4.  Central aortic pressure is independently associated with diastolic function.

Authors:  Sumeet Subherwal; Lisa de las Fuentes; Alan D Waggoner; Sharon Heuerman; Karen E Spence; Victor G Davila-Roman
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Central venous pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure: fresh clinical perspectives from a new model of discordant and concordant heart failure.

Authors:  Tony S Ma; Biykem Bozkurt; David Paniagua; Biswajit Kar; Kumudha Ramasubbu; Carl F Rothe
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2011

6.  Pulse pressure and arterial compliance prior to pregnancy and the development of complicated hypertension during pregnancy.

Authors:  Sarah Hale; Martha Choate; Adrienne Schonberg; Robert Shapiro; Gary Badger; Ira M Bernstein
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 7.  Clinical achievements of impedance analysis.

Authors:  Gary F Mitchell
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  A large-scale, energetic model of cardiovascular homeostasis predicts dynamics of arterial pressure in humans.

Authors:  Alexander Roytvarf; Vladimir Shusterman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Central rather than brachial pressures are stronger predictors of cardiovascular outcomes: A longitudinal prospective study in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Ying Dong; Linlin Jiang; Xin Wang; Zuo Chen; Linfeng Zhang; Zugui Zhang; Congyi Zheng; Yuting Kang; Zengwu Wang; Huiqing Cao; Xiaoxia Wang; Tian Fang; Xiaoyan Han; Zhe Li; Ye Tian; Lihang Dong; Fengyu Sun; Fucai Yuan; Xin Zhou; Yunyang Zhu; Yi He; Qingping Xi; Ruihai Yang; Jun Yang; Yong Ren; Maiqi Dan; Yiyue Wang; Daming Yu; Ru Ju; Dongshuang Guo; Dahua Tan; Zhiguo Zheng; Jingjing Zheng; Yang Xu; Dongsheng Wang; Tao Chen; Meihui Su; Yongde Zhang; Zhanhang Sun; Chen Dai
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Central or peripheral systolic or pulse pressure: which best relates to target organs and future mortality?

Authors:  Kang-Ling Wang; Hao-Min Cheng; Shao-Yuan Chuang; Harold A Spurgeon; Chih-Tai Ting; Edward G Lakatta; Frank C P Yin; Pesus Chou; Chen-Huan Chen
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.844

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.