Literature DB >> 9739975

Curbside consultation practices and attitudes among primary care physicians and medical subspecialists.

D Kuo1, D R Gifford, M D Stein.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Informal (curbside) consultations are an integral part of medical culture and may be of great value to patients and primary care physicians. However, little is known about physicians' behavior or attitudes toward curbside consultation.
OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare curbside consultation practices and attitudes among primary care physicians and medical subspecialists.
DESIGN: Survey mailed in June 1997. PARTICIPANTS: Of 286 primary care physicians and 252 subspecialists practicing in Rhode Island, 213 primary care physicians and 200 subspecialists responded (response rate, 76.8%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported practices of, reasons for, and attitudes about curbside consultation.
RESULTS: Of primary care physicians, 70.4% (150/213) and 87.5% (175/200) of subspecialists reported participating in at least 1 curbside consultation during the previous week. In the previous week, primary care physicians obtained 3.2 curbside consultations, whereas subspecialists received 3.6 requests for curbside consultations. Subspecialties most frequently involved in curbside consultations were cardiology, gastroenterology, and infectious diseases; subspecialties that were requested to provide curbside consultations more often than they were formally consulted were endocrinology, infectious diseases, and rheumatology. Curbside consultations were most often used to select appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment plans and to determine the need for formal consultation. Subspecialists perceived more often than primary care physicians that information communicated in curbside consultations was insufficient (80.2% vs 49.8%; P<.001) and that important clinical detail was not described (77.6% vs 43.5%; P<.001). More subspecialists than primary care physicians felt that curbside consultations were essential for maintaining good relationships with other physicians (77.2% vs 38.6%; P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Curbside consultation serves important functions in the practice of medicine. Despite the widespread use of curbside consultation, disagreement exists between primary care physicians and subspecialists as to the role of curbside consultation and the quality of the information exchanged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9739975     DOI: 10.1001/jama.280.10.905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  26 in total

1.  Off-the-cuff cellular phone consultations in a family practice.

Authors:  R Peleg
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Changes in learning-resource use across physicians' learning episodes.

Authors:  H B Slotnick; T R Harris; D R Antonenko
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2001-04

3.  Chiropractors and collaborative care: An overview illustrated with a case report.

Authors:  John J Riva; Gloria D Muller; Adrian A Hornich; Silvano A Mior; Anita Gupta; Stephen J Burnie
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2010-09

Review 4.  The interface of primary and oncology specialty care: from symptoms to diagnosis.

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Steven Latosinsky
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

5.  Physician use of the curbside consultation to address information needs: report on a collective case study.

Authors:  Cathy M Perley
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2006-04

Review 6.  Infectious diseases consultations can make the difference: a brief review and a plea for more infectious diseases specialists in Germany.

Authors:  Siegbert Rieg; Marc Fabian Küpper
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.553

7.  Social networks and physician adoption of electronic health records: insights from an empirical study.

Authors:  Kai Zheng; Rema Padman; David Krackhardt; Michael P Johnson; Herbert S Diamond
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Inaccurate communications in telephone calls to an antimicrobial stewardship program.

Authors:  Darren R Linkin; Sarah Paris; Neil O Fishman; Joshua P Metlay; Ebbing Lautenbach
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 3.254

9.  Curbside consultation re-imagined: Borrowing from the conflict management toolkit.

Authors:  Lauren M Edelstein; John J Lynch; Nneka O Mokwunye; Evan G DeRenzo
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2010-03

10.  The corridor consult.

Authors:  Sandra Lowe
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2017-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.