Literature DB >> 9739974

Physicians' experiences and beliefs regarding informal consultation.

N L Keating1, A M Zaslavsky, J Z Ayanian.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Efforts to control medical expenses by emphasizing primary care and limiting specialty care may influence how physicians use informal or "curbside" consultation.
OBJECTIVE: To understand physicians' use of and beliefs about informal consultation.
DESIGN: Survey mailed in July 1997. PARTICIPANTS: Of a random sample of Massachusetts general internists, pediatricians, cardiologists, orthopedic surgeons (n=300 each), and infectious disease specialists (n=200) surveyed, 1225 were eligible and 705 (58%) responded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported use of and beliefs about informal consultation.
RESULTS: Generalist physicians requested more informal consultations than specialists (median, 3 vs 1 per week; P<.001) and were asked to provide fewer (2 vs 5 per week; P<.001). In multivariate analyses, physicians in a health maintenance organization, multispecialty group, or single-specialty group requested more informal consultations than those in solo practice (82%, 40%, and 28% more, respectively; all P<.001) and were more often asked to provide them (43%, 63%, and 14% more, respectively; all P<.05). Physicians with at least 30% of their income from capitation requested 38% more and were asked to provide 46% more informal consultations than those with little or no income from capitation (both P<.001). Generalists' overall approval of informal consultation was greater than specialists' (mean 5.9 vs 5.1 on a 7-point Likert scale; P<.001), and approval was strongly associated with beliefs about how informal consultation affects quality of care (P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Use of informal consultation is common, varies by specialty, practice setting, and capitation, and therefore may increase with current trends toward group practice and managed care. Because overall approval of informal consultation is strongly associated with beliefs about how it affects quality of care, this issue should be carefully considered by physicians who participate in informal consultation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9739974     DOI: 10.1001/jama.280.10.900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  28 in total

1.  Physicians' reports of focused expertise in clinical practice.

Authors:  N L Keating; A M Zaslavsky; J Z Ayanian
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Off-the-cuff cellular phone consultations in a family practice.

Authors:  R Peleg
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Chiropractors and collaborative care: An overview illustrated with a case report.

Authors:  John J Riva; Gloria D Muller; Adrian A Hornich; Silvano A Mior; Anita Gupta; Stephen J Burnie
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2010-09

Review 4.  The interface of primary and oncology specialty care: from symptoms to diagnosis.

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Steven Latosinsky
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

5.  Physician use of the curbside consultation to address information needs: report on a collective case study.

Authors:  Cathy M Perley
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2006-04

6.  Interprofessional Curbside Consults to Develop Team Communication and Improve Student Achievement of Learning Outcomes.

Authors:  Jennifer Kirwin; Kristin Curry Greenwood; Janet Rico; Romesh Nalliah; Margarita DiVall
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Inaccurate communications in telephone calls to an antimicrobial stewardship program.

Authors:  Darren R Linkin; Sarah Paris; Neil O Fishman; Joshua P Metlay; Ebbing Lautenbach
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 3.254

8.  Physician social networks and variation in rates of complications after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Craig Evan Pollack; Hao Wang; Justin E Bekelman; Gary Weissman; Andrew J Epstein; Kaijun Liao; Eva H Dugoff; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 5.725

9.  Methods and practices of investigators for determining participants' decisional capacity and comprehension of protocols.

Authors:  Alexander A Kon; Michael Klug
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  The practice of child and adolescent psychiatry: a survey of early-career psychiatrists in Japan.

Authors:  Masaru Tateno; Naoki Uchida; Saya Kikuchi; Ryosaku Kawada; Seiju Kobayashi; Wakako Nakano; Ryuji Sasaki; Keisuke Shibata; Tomohiro Shirasaka; Muneyuki Suzuki; Kumi Uehara; Toshikazu Saito
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 3.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.