Literature DB >> 9738582

Risk-based recommendations for mammographic screening for women in their forties.

M Gail1, B Rimer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop risk-based recommendations for mammographic screening for women in their 40s that take into account the woman's age, race, and specific risk factors.
METHODS: We assumed that regular mammographic screening is justified for a 50-year-old woman, even one with no risk factors, and that a younger woman with an expected 1-year breast cancer incidence rate as great or greater than that of a 50-year-old woman with no risk factors would benefit sufficiently to justify regular screening. Recommendations under this criterion were based on age- and race-specific breast cancer incidence rates from the National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program; assessments of risk factors from the Breast Cancer Detection and Demonstration Project (BCDDP); and reports in the literature.
RESULTS: Two methods, the exact-age procedure (EAP) and the grouped-age procedure (GAP), were developed. The less precise GAP only requires following a flow diagram. The proportion of white women recommended for screening by the EAP ranges from 10% for 40-year-old women to 95% for 49-year-old women, and the corresponding percentages for black women are 16% and 95%. The assumptions that underlie the guidelines are discussed critically.
CONCLUSION: For women or physicians who prefer an individualized approach in deciding whether to initiate regular mammographic screening in the age range of 40 to 49 years, the present report offers recommendations based on individualized risk-factor data and clearly stated assumptions that have an empiric basis. These recommendations can be used to facilitate the counseling process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9738582     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.9.3105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  7 in total

1.  The relation between projected breast cancer risk, perceived cancer risk, and mammography use. Results from the National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  C P Gross; G Filardo; H S Singh; A N Freedman; M H Farrell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Estimation and interpretation of models of absolute risk from epidemiologic data, including family-based studies.

Authors:  Mitchell H Gail
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Twenty-five years of breast cancer risk models and their applications.

Authors:  Mitchell H Gail
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Breast Cancer Risk Model Requirements for Counseling, Prevention, and Screening.

Authors:  Mitchell H Gail; Ruth M Pfeiffer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Breast MRI use uncommon among U.S. women.

Authors:  Jacqueline W Miller; Susan A Sabatino; Trevor D Thompson; Nancy Breen; Mary C White; A Blythe Ryerson; Stephen Taplin; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Diffusion of breast cancer risk assessment in primary care.

Authors:  Carmen E Guerra; Melani Sherman; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

7.  How does age affect baseline screening mammography performance measures? A decision model.

Authors:  John D Keen; James E Keen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2008-09-21       Impact factor: 2.796

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.