Literature DB >> 9738521

Randomized controlled study of effects of sudden impact loading on rat femur.

T L Järvinen1, P Kannus, H Sievänen, P Jolma, A Heinonen, M Järvinen.   

Abstract

Physical loading creating high peak strains on the skeleton at high strain rates is suggested to be the most effective type of activity in terms of bone mineral acquisition. This study assessed the effects of sudden impact loading on mineral and mechanical bone properties in 13-week-old Sprague-Dawley rats. The rats were randomly assigned as sedentary controls (SED, n = 10), control animals receiving low-intensity exercise (EX, n = 15), and experimental animals receiving low-intensity exercise combined with sudden impact-loading (EX + IMP, n = 15). In the EX group, the rats walked in a walking mill at a speed of 10 cm/s for 20 minutes/day, 5 days/week for 9 weeks. In the EX + IMP group, the program was identical to the EX group except for the additional sudden impacts administered to their skeleton during the walking exercise. At the start, there were 50 impacts per session, after which their number was gradually increased to 200 impacts per session by week 6 and then kept constant until the end of the experiment, week 9. These horizontally and vertically directed body impacts were produced by a custom-made walking mill equipped with computer-controlled high-pressure air cylinders. After sacrifice, both femora of each rat were removed and their dimensions, bone mineral content (BMC) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and mechanical properties by femoral shaft three-point bending and femoral neck compression were determined. The cortical wall thickness increased significantly in the EX and EX + IMP groups as compared with SEDs (+7.6%, p = 0.049 and +10%, p = 0.020, respectively). The EX + IMP group showed +9.0% (p = 0.046) higher cross-sectional moment of inertia values than the EX group. No significant intergroup differences were seen in the BMC values, while the breaking load of the femoral shaft (EX + IMP vs. SED +8.8%,p = 0.047) and femoral neck (EX + IMP vs. SED +14.1%, p = 0.013) was significantly enhanced by the impact loading. In conclusion, this study indicates that mechanical loading can substantially improve the mechanical characteristics of a rat femur without simultaneous gain in its mineral mass. If this is true in humans too, our finding gives an interesting perspective to the numerous longitudinal exercise studies (of women) in which the exercise-induced gains in bone mass and density have remained mild to moderate only.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9738521     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.9.1475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  20 in total

1.  Do high impact exercises produce higher tibial strains than running?

Authors:  C Milgrom; A Finestone; Y Levi; A Simkin; I Ekenman; S Mendelson; M Millgram; M Nyska; N Benjuya; D Burr
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Adaptive skeletal responses to mechanical loading during adolescence.

Authors:  David A Greene; Geraldine A Naughton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Bioabsorbable screw divergence angle, not tunnel preparation method influences soft tissue tendon graft-bone tunnel fixation in healthy bone.

Authors:  Andrew R Duffee; Jeffrey A Brunelli; John Nyland; Robert Burden; Akbar Nawab; David Caborn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-09-09       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Maintenance of exercise-induced benefits in physical functioning and bone among elderly women.

Authors:  S Karinkanta; A Heinonen; H Sievänen; K Uusi-Rasi; M Fogelholm; P Kannus
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Three-month bilateral hopping intervention is ineffective in initiating bone biomarker response in healthy elderly men.

Authors:  Timo Rantalainen; M Hoffrén; V Linnamo; A Heinonen; P V Komi; J Avela; B C Nindl
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-02-06       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  Combating osteoporosis and obesity with exercise: leveraging cell mechanosensitivity.

Authors:  Gabriel M Pagnotti; Maya Styner; Gunes Uzer; Vihitaben S Patel; Laura E Wright; Kirsten K Ness; Theresa A Guise; Janet Rubin; Clinton T Rubin
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 43.330

7.  Quick benefits of interval training versus continuous training on bone: a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry comparative study.

Authors:  Arnaud Boudenot; Delphine B Maurel; Stéphane Pallu; Isabelle Ingrand; Nathalie Boisseau; Christelle Jaffré; Hugues Portier
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  Whole-body vibration and resistance exercise prevent long-term hindlimb unloading-induced bone loss: independent and interactive effects.

Authors:  Zhili Li; Cheng Tan; Yonghua Wu; Ye Ding; Huijuan Wang; Wenjuan Chen; Yu Zhu; Honglei Ma; Honghui Yang; Wenbin Liang; Shizhong Jiang; Desheng Wang; Linjie Wang; Guohua Tang; Jun Wang
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 9.  Bone quality: the determinants of bone strength and fragility.

Authors:  Hélder Fonseca; Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves; Hans-Joachim Appell Coriolano; José Alberto Duarte
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 10.  Muscle and bone plasticity after spinal cord injury: review of adaptations to disuse and to electrical muscle stimulation.

Authors:  Shauna Dudley-Javoroski; Richard K Shields
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.