Literature DB >> 9738434

An introduction to a UK scheme to help small firms control health risks from chemicals.

R M Russell1, S C Maidment, I Brooke, M D Topping.   

Abstract

The Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 1994 (COSHH), provide the main British legislation to protect against health risks arising from hazardous substances used at work. Under the regulations, employers have a duty to carry out a suitable and sufficient risk assessment and take steps to ensure exposure is adequately controlled. The paper by Topping et al. (1998) concluded that small firms need more basic, readily available advice on how to effectively control hazardous substances. To meet this need the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and the Advisory Committee on Toxic Substances (ACTS) have developed a new scheme for the UK. It involves a simple system of generic risk assessments to identify appropriate control strategies and a series of control guidance sheets providing good-practice examples of those strategies for common operations. The approach builds on earlier industry risk banding schemes and HSE's general approach to risk assessment and risk management. To help ensure the advice reaches small firms, HSE is seeking to involve key intermediaries in its dissemination. This paper describes the rationale for the new UK scheme, how it sits in the legal framework, and proposals for its dissemination. The papers by Brooke (1998) and Maidment (1998) set out in detail the technical basis for the scheme.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9738434     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4878(98)00056-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  10 in total

1.  Occupational exposure limits for chemicals.

Authors:  M Topping
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Exposure models for the prior distribution in bayesian decision analysis for occupational hygiene decision making.

Authors:  Eun Gyung Lee; Seung Won Kim; Charles E Feigley; Martin Harper
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Can Control Banding be Useful for the Safe Handling of Nanomaterials? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Adrienne Eastlake; Ralph Zumwalde; Charles Geraci
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.253

4.  Evaluation of the COSHH Essentials model with a mixture of organic chemicals at a medium-sized paint producer.

Authors:  Eun Gyung Lee; James Slaven; Russell B Bowen; Martin Harper
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2010-11-03

5.  Qualitative and quantitative differences between common occupational health risk assessment models in typical industries.

Authors:  Fang Tian; Meibian Zhang; Lifang Zhou; Hua Zou; Aihong Wang; Mo Hao
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.708

6.  Review and Improvement of Chemical Hazard Risk Management of Korean Occupational Safety and Health Agency.

Authors:  Saemi Shin; Sang-Hoon Byeon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  A hazardous substance exposure prevention rating method for intervention needs assessment and effectiveness evaluation: the Small Business Exposure Index.

Authors:  Anthony D LaMontagne; Anne M Stoddard; Cora Roelofs; Grace Sembajwe; Amy L Sapp; Glorian Sorensen
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 5.984

8.  Risk Assessment of Physical Hazards in Greek Hospitals Combining Staff's Perception, Experts' Evaluation and Objective Measurements.

Authors:  Styliani Gewrgios Tziaferi; Panayiota Sourtzi; Athina Kalokairinou; Evi Sgourou; Emmanouel Koumoulas; Emmanouel Velonakis
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2011-09-30

9.  Occupational health policies on risk assessment in Japan.

Authors:  Seichi Horie
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2010-09-30

10.  Developing a semi-quantitative occupational risk prediction model for chemical exposures and its application to a national chemical exposure databank.

Authors:  Shih-Min Wang; Trong-Neng Wu; Yow-Jer Juang; Yu-Tung Dai; Perng-Jy Tsai; Chiu-Ying Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.