Literature DB >> 9738056

Use of molecular and reference susceptibility testing methods in a multicenter evaluation of MicroScan dried overnight gram-positive MIC panels for detection of vancomycin and high-level aminoglycoside resistances in enterococci.

Y S Chen1, S A Marshall, P L Winokur, S L Coffman, W W Wilke, P R Murray, C A Spiegel, M A Pfaller, G V Doern, R N Jones.   

Abstract

Modified MicroScan gram-positive MIC no. 8 panels (PM-8) were analyzed for their improved ability to detect vancomycin resistance (VR) and high-level aminoglycoside resistance (HLAR) in enterococci. A validation study design that utilized selected challenge strains, recent clinical isolates, and reproducibility experiments in a multicenter format was selected. Three independent medical centers compared the commercial panels to reference broth microdilution panels (RBM) and Synergy Quad Agar (QA). Resistance was verified by demonstration of VR and HLAR genes by PCR tests. The study was conducted in three phases. (i) In the challenge phase (CP), two well-characterized sets of enterococci were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; one set contained 50 isolates for VR testing and one contained 48 isolates for HLAR testing. In addition, a set of 47 well-characterized isolates representing diverse geographic areas, obtained from earlier national surveillance studies, was tested at the University of Iowa College of Medicine (UICM). (ii) In the efficacy phase (EP), each laboratory tested 50 recent, unique clinical isolates by all methods. (iii) In the reproducibility Phase (RP), each laboratory tested the same 10 strains by all methods in triplicate on three separate days. All isolates from the EP were sent to the UICM for molecular characterization of vanA, -B, -C1, -C2-3, and HLAR genes. In the CP, the ranking of test methods by error rates (in parentheses; very major and major errors combined, versus PCR results) were as follows: for high-level streptomycin resistance (HLSR), QA (12.0%) > PM-8 (5.2%) > RBM (1.6%); for high-level gentamicin resistance (HLGR), RBM (3.7%) > PM-8 (3.1%) > QA (2.6%); and for VR, RBM = QA (3.0%) > PM-8 (1.2%). In the EP, agreement between all methods and the reference PCR result was 98.0% for HLSR, 99.3% for HLGR, and 98. 6% for VR. In the RP, the percentages of results +/- 1 log2 dilution of the all-participant mode were as follows: for VR, 100% (PM-8), 98.9% (QA), and 90.0% (RBM); for HLSR, 99.6% (RBM), 98.5% (PM-8), and 82.2% (QA); and for HLGR, 99.6% (RBM), 99.3% (PM-8), and 98.1% (QA). The ability of the PM-8 to detect VR and HLAR in enterococci was comparable to those for reference susceptibility and molecular PCR methods and was considered acceptable for routine clinical laboratory use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9738056      PMCID: PMC105100     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  32 in total

Review 1.  Emergence of Enterococcus as a significant pathogen.

Authors:  R C Moellering
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Comparison of the new MicroScan Pos MIC Type 6 panel and AMS-Vitek Gram Positive Susceptibility Card (GPS-TA) for detection of high-level aminoglycoside resistance in Enterococcus species.

Authors:  S Szeto; M Louie; D E Low; M Patel; A E Simor
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Studies on antibiotic synergism against enterococci. I. Bacteriologic studies.

Authors:  R C Moellering; C Wennersten; A N Weinberg
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  1971-05

4.  Detection of vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus species.

Authors:  B M Willey; B N Kreiswirth; A E Simor; G Willaims; S R Scriver; A Phillips; D E Low
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Detection of high-level aminoglycoside resistance in enterococci other than Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  D F Sahm; S Boonlayangoor; J E Schulz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Accuracy of the E test for determining antimicrobial susceptibilities of staphylococci, enterococci, Campylobacter jejuni, and gram-negative bacteria resistant to antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  M B Huang; C N Baker; S Banerjee; F C Tenover
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Molecular characterization of highly gentamicin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis isolates lacking high-level streptomycin resistance.

Authors:  L A Thal; J W Chow; J E Patterson; M B Perri; S Donabedian; D B Clewell; M J Zervos
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  M Louie; A E Simor; S Szeto; M Patel; B Kreiswirth; D E Low
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Vancomycin resistance gene vanC is specific to Enterococcus gallinarum.

Authors:  R Leclercq; S Dutka-Malen; J Duval; P Courvalin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with bloodstream infection: frequencies of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program (United States and Canada, 1997).

Authors:  M A Pfaller; R N Jones; G V Doern; K Kugler
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Molecular detection of antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  A C Fluit; M R Visser; F J Schmitz
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Comparison of microscan broth microdilution, synergy quad plate agar dilution, and disk diffusion screening methods for detection of high-level aminoglycoside resistance in enterococcus species.

Authors:  David R Murdoch; Stanley Mirrett; Lizzie J Harrell; Susan M Donabedian; Marcus J Zervos; L Barth Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  An Update on the Emergence of Glycopeptide Resistance in Enterococci.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 4.  Current concepts in laboratory testing to guide antimicrobial therapy.

Authors:  Stephen G Jenkins; Audrey N Schuetz
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 5.  Expert systems in clinical microbiology.

Authors:  Trevor Winstanley; Patrice Courvalin
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Evaluation of the revised MicroScan dried overnight gram-positive identification panel to identify Enterococcus species.

Authors:  P C Iwen; M E Rupp; P C Schreckenberger; S H Hinrichs
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of D-xylose and 1% methyl-alpha-D-glucopyranoside fermentation tests for distinguishing Enterococcus gallinarum from Enterococcus faecium.

Authors:  D K Chen; L Pearce; A McGeer; D E Low; B M Willey
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Rapid detection of vanA and vanB genes directly from clinical specimens and enrichment broths by real-time multiplex PCR assay.

Authors:  Silvano Palladino; Ian D Kay; James P Flexman; Ingrid Boehm; Anna Maria G Costa; Erica J Lambert; Keryn J Christiansen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.948

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.