Literature DB >> 9737982

Testing the charge difference hypothesis for the assembly of a eucaryotic multispanning membrane protein.

M Sato1, R Hresko, M Mueckler.   

Abstract

The Glut1 glucose transporter is a glycoprotein whose membrane topology has been verified by a number of experimental observations, all of which are consistent with a 12-transmembrane helix model originally based on hydrophobicity analysis. We used Glut1 as a model multispanning membrane protein to test the Charge Difference Hypothesis (Hartmann, E., Rapoport, T. A., and Lodish, H. F. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 5786-5790), which asserts that the topology of a eucaryotic multispanning membrane protein is determined solely by the amino acid charge difference across the first transmembrane segment. The charge difference across the first transmembrane segment of Glut1 was progressively inverted in two independent series of mutants, one series in which only the number of positively charged amino acid residues in the two flanking domains was altered and the other in which only the number of negatively charged residues in the two flanking domains was changed. The results indicate that the charge difference across the first transmembrane segment does affect the topology of the protein, but that contrary to the hypothesis, it only dictates the orientation of the first transmembrane segment and the disposition of the amino terminus and the first linker domain. Charge inversion resulted in the formation of aberrant molecules in which either the first or second transmembrane segment failed to insert into the membrane. The topology of downstream regions of Glut1 was unaffected by charge inversion across the first transmembrane segment, indicating that downstream sequences are important in determining the local topological disposition of the molecule.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9737982     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.273.39.25203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  12 in total

Review 1.  Membrane topology and insertion of membrane proteins: search for topogenic signals.

Authors:  M van Geest; J S Lolkema
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Folding and activity of circularly permuted forms of a polytopic membrane protein.

Authors:  R Beutler; F Ruggiero; B Erni
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Lipid-Assisted Membrane Protein Folding and Topogenesis.

Authors:  William Dowhan; Heidi Vitrac; Mikhail Bogdanov
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.371

4.  Mechanism and hydrophobic forces driving membrane protein insertion of subunit II of cytochrome bo 3 oxidase.

Authors:  Nil Celebi; Ross E Dalbey; Jijun Yuan
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 5.  Membrane Protein Integration and Topogenesis at the ER.

Authors:  Martin Spiess; Tina Junne; Marco Janoschke
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.371

Review 6.  Membrane protein insertion at the endoplasmic reticulum.

Authors:  Sichen Shao; Ramanujan S Hegde
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 13.827

Review 7.  Lipids and topological rules governing membrane protein assembly.

Authors:  Mikhail Bogdanov; William Dowhan; Heidi Vitrac
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2013-12-14

8.  Glycosylation can influence topogenesis of membrane proteins and reveals dynamic reorientation of nascent polypeptides within the translocon.

Authors:  V Goder; C Bieri; M Spiess
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1999-10-18       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Determining the N-terminal orientations of recombinant transmembrane proteins in the Escherichia coli plasma membrane.

Authors:  Chien-Hsien Lee; Chia-Cheng Chou; Min-Feng Hsu; Andrew H-J Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Charged residues next to transmembrane regions revisited: "Positive-inside rule" is complemented by the "negative inside depletion/outside enrichment rule".

Authors:  James Alexander Baker; Wing-Cheong Wong; Birgit Eisenhaber; Jim Warwicker; Frank Eisenhaber
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 7.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.