Literature DB >> 9737632

The experience of an academic medical center with endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

M Makaroun1, A Zajko, P Orons, S Muluk, R Rhee, D Steed, M Webster.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is gaining momentum although it is not yet approved in the United States by regulatory agencies. The Endovascular Grafting System (EGS), the first device to enter clinical trials in 1993, is now in phase III testing.
METHODS: We reviewed the first 50 patients to undergo an EGS repair of AAA over 24 months at our institution. Results were compared with 69 patients who underwent open repair during the same time period by the same surgeon.
RESULTS: Devices were successfully implanted in 47 of 50 (94%) patients. Three were converted to standard repair. Although length of stay was shorter, costs were similar. Follow-up was 3 to 24 months. Perigraft flow was noted in 33% at discharge; 73% of those stopped either spontaneously or with coiling. Three graft limbs occluded, requiring thrombolytic therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: The EGS repair of AAA is feasible and effective. Cooperation between surgery and radiology is important for the success of a new endovascular program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9737632     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00123-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  1 in total

1.  The financial implications of endovascular aneurysm repair in the cost containment era.

Authors:  David H Stone; Alexander J Horvath; Philip P Goodney; Eva M Rzucidlo; Brian W Nolan; Daniel B Walsh; Robert M Zwolak; Richard J Powell
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 4.268

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.