Literature DB >> 9736884

Hyaline membrane disease is underreported in a linked birth-infant death certificate database.

A Hamvas1, P Kwong, M DeBaun, W Schramm, F S Cole.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the Missouri State Department of Health linked birth-infant death certificate database and medical records with respect to recording hyaline membrane disease in very low-birth-weight infants.
METHODS: We reviewed the records for all 976 infants weighing 500 to 1500 g who were born to St. Louis, Mo, residents in 1989, 1991, and 1992.
RESULTS: Eighteen percent of the birth certificates and 54% of the medical records documented hyaline membrane disease, resulting in 34% sensitivity and 99% specificity.
CONCLUSIONS: The Missouri State Department of Health birth-infant death certificate database underestimates the incidence of hyaline membrane disease, which suggest that national statistics for the disease are also underestimated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9736884      PMCID: PMC1509088          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.88.9.1387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  8 in total

1.  The 1989 revisions of the US Standard Certificates of Live Birth and Death and the US Standard Report of Fetal Death.

Authors:  M A Freedman; G A Gay; J E Brockert; P W Potrzebowski; C J Rothwell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Variations in the accuracy of obstetric procedures and diagnoses on birth records in Washington State, 1989.

Authors:  K M Parrish; V L Holt; F A Connell; B Williams; J P LoGerfo
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-07-15       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  The quality of the new birth certificate data: a validation study in North Carolina.

Authors:  P A Buescher; K P Taylor; M H Davis; J M Bowling
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The influence of the wider use of surfactant therapy on neonatal mortality among blacks and whites.

Authors:  A Hamvas; P H Wise; R K Yang; N S Wampler; A Noguchi; M M Maurer; C A Walentik; W F Schramm; F S Cole
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-06-20       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Revised U.S. certificate of birth--new opportunities for research on birth outcome.

Authors:  S M Taffel; S J Ventura; G A Gay
Journal:  Birth       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.689

6.  Validation of 1989 Tennessee birth certificates using maternal and newborn hospital records.

Authors:  J M Piper; E F Mitchel; M Snowden; C Hall; M Adams; P Taylor
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Annual summary of vital statistics--1992.

Authors:  M E Wegman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Selected antepartum medical complications and very-low-birthweight infants among black and white women.

Authors:  M DeBaun; D Rowley; M Province; J W Stockbauer; F S Cole
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.308

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Comparing hospital discharge records with death certificates: can the differences be explained?

Authors:  Lars Age Johansson; R Westerling
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 2.  Validation of administrative health data for the pediatric population: a scoping review.

Authors:  Natalie J Shiff; Sadia Jama; Catherine Boden; Lisa M Lix
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 2.655

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.