BACKGROUND: Although mounting evidence supports the idea that smooth pursuit abnormality marks the genetic liability to schizophrenia, the precise ocular motor mechanism underlying the abnormality remains unknown. Based on recent findings in schizophrenia, we hypothesize that subtle deficits in the ability to hold online and/or use extraretinal motion information underlie the pursuit abnormality in vulnerable individuals. METHODS: The hypothesis was tested in 69 first-degree, biological relatives of probands with schizophrenia; 26 relatives had schizophrenia spectrum personalities (SSP). Subjects recruited from the community (n=71; 29 with SSP), without a known family history of psychosis, constituted the comparison groups. The traditional smooth pursuit gain measure, which is a ratio of smooth pursuit eye velocity in response to both retinal and extraretinal motion signals and the target velocity, was obtained. In addition, newly developed measures of predictive smooth pursuit (ie, in the presence of only extraretinal motion signals) were obtained. The latter measures were evaluated after the current retinal motion signals were made unavailable by briefly making the target invisible. RESULTS: Relatives, particularly those with SSP, showed significantly poorer predictive pursuit response to extraretinal motion signals (F(2,136)=6.51, P<.005), compared with the community subjects. However, the traditional smooth pursuit gain in response to both retinal and extraretinal motion signals was not different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that relatives of patients with schizophrenia, particularly those with SSP, have specific deficits in predictive pursuit based on only extraretinal motion signals. Normal smooth pursuit gain in response to both retinal and extraretinal motion signals is likely due to compensation based on retinal motion information. The latter suggests normal retinal motion processing and smooth pursuit motor output.
BACKGROUND: Although mounting evidence supports the idea that smooth pursuit abnormality marks the genetic liability to schizophrenia, the precise ocular motor mechanism underlying the abnormality remains unknown. Based on recent findings in schizophrenia, we hypothesize that subtle deficits in the ability to hold online and/or use extraretinal motion information underlie the pursuit abnormality in vulnerable individuals. METHODS: The hypothesis was tested in 69 first-degree, biological relatives of probands with schizophrenia; 26 relatives had schizophrenia spectrum personalities (SSP). Subjects recruited from the community (n=71; 29 with SSP), without a known family history of psychosis, constituted the comparison groups. The traditional smooth pursuit gain measure, which is a ratio of smooth pursuit eye velocity in response to both retinal and extraretinal motion signals and the target velocity, was obtained. In addition, newly developed measures of predictive smooth pursuit (ie, in the presence of only extraretinal motion signals) were obtained. The latter measures were evaluated after the current retinal motion signals were made unavailable by briefly making the target invisible. RESULTS: Relatives, particularly those with SSP, showed significantly poorer predictive pursuit response to extraretinal motion signals (F(2,136)=6.51, P<.005), compared with the community subjects. However, the traditional smooth pursuit gain in response to both retinal and extraretinal motion signals was not different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that relatives of patients with schizophrenia, particularly those with SSP, have specific deficits in predictive pursuit based on only extraretinal motion signals. Normal smooth pursuit gain in response to both retinal and extraretinal motion signals is likely due to compensation based on retinal motion information. The latter suggests normal retinal motion processing and smooth pursuit motor output.
Authors: Alice M Saperstein; Rebecca L Fuller; Matthew T Avila; Helene Adami; Robert P McMahon; Gunvant K Thaker; James M Gold Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2006-05-10 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Ikwunga Wonodi; O Colin Stine; Korrapati V Sathyasaikumar; Rosalinda C Roberts; Braxton D Mitchell; L Elliot Hong; Yasushi Kajii; Gunvant K Thaker; Robert Schwarcz Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2011-07
Authors: Rebekka Lencer; Andreas Sprenger; James L Reilly; Jennifer E McDowell; Leah H Rubin; Judith A Badner; Matcheri S Keshavan; Godfrey D Pearlson; Carol A Tamminga; Elliot S Gershon; Brett A Clementz; John A Sweeney Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Emmanouil Kattoulas; Ioannis Evdokimidis; Nicholas C Stefanis; Dimitrios Avramopoulos; Costas N Stefanis; Nikolaos Smyrnis Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2011-10-11 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Yue Chen; Emily D Grossman; L Cinnamon Bidwell; Deborah Yurgelun-Todd; Staci A Gruber; Deborah L Levy; Ken Nakayama; Philip S Holzman Journal: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: L Elliot Hong; Kathleen A Turano; Hugh B O'Neill; Lei Hao; Ikwunga Wonodi; Robert P McMahon; Gunvant K Thaker Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2008-12-03 Impact factor: 13.382