Literature DB >> 9733804

Transmembrane protein insertion orientation in yeast depends on the charge difference across transmembrane segments, their total hydrophobicity, and its distribution.

C A Harley1, J A Holt, R Turner, D J Tipper.   

Abstract

The determinants of transmembrane protein insertion orientation at the endoplasmic reticulum have been investigated in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using variants of a Type III (naturally exofacial N terminus (Nexo)) transmembrane fusion protein derived from the N terminus of Ste2p, the alpha-factor receptor. Small positive and negative charges adjacent to the transmembrane segment had equal and opposite effects on orientation, and this effect was independent of N- or C-terminal location, consistent with a purely electrostatic interaction with response mechanisms. A 3:1 bias toward Nexo insertion, observed in the absence of a charge difference, was shown to reflect the Nexo bias conferred by longer transmembrane segments. Orientation correlated best with total hydrophobicity rather than length, but it was also strongly affected by the distribution of hydrophobicity within the transmembrane segment. The most hydrophobic terminus was preferentially translocated. Insertion orientation thus depends on integration of responses to at least three parameters: charge difference across a transmembrane segment, its total hydrophobicity, and its hydrophobicity gradient. Relative signal strengths were estimated, and consequences for topology prediction are discussed. Responses to transmembrane sequence may depend on protein-translocon interactions, but responses to charge difference may be mediated by the electrostatic field provided by anionic phospholipids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9733804     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.273.38.24963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  24 in total

1.  Sec61p contributes to signal sequence orientation according to the positive-inside rule.

Authors:  Veit Goder; Tina Junne; Martin Spiess
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 2.  Understanding the biogenesis of polytopic integral membrane proteins.

Authors:  R J Turner
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 1.843

3.  Molecular mechanism of signal sequence orientation in the endoplasmic reticulum.

Authors:  Veit Goder; Martin Spiess
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  β-Subunit of the Ostα-Ostβ organic solute transporter is required not only for heterodimerization and trafficking but also for function.

Authors:  Whitney V Christian; Na Li; Patricia M Hinkle; Nazzareno Ballatori
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Subcellular localization and membrane topology of the melon ethylene receptor CmERS1.

Authors:  Biao Ma; Min-Long Cui; Hyeon-Jin Sun; Keita Takada; Hitoshi Mori; Hiroshi Kamada; Hiroshi Ezura
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2006-04-14       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 6.  Lipid-Assisted Membrane Protein Folding and Topogenesis.

Authors:  William Dowhan; Heidi Vitrac; Mikhail Bogdanov
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.371

7.  Translocation of mitochondrially synthesized Cox2 domains from the matrix to the intermembrane space.

Authors:  Heather L Fiumera; Sarah A Broadley; Thomas D Fox
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Passenger protein determines translocation versus retention in the endoplasmic reticulum for aromatase expression.

Authors:  Jasmeet Kaur; Himangshu S Bose
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 4.436

9.  Effects of mixed proximal and distal topogenic signals on the topological sensitivity of a membrane protein to the lipid environment.

Authors:  Heidi Vitrac; William Dowhan; Mikhail Bogdanov
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.747

10.  A Link between Integral Membrane Protein Expression and Simulated Integration Efficiency.

Authors:  Stephen S Marshall; Michiel J M Niesen; Axel Müller; Katrin Tiemann; Shyam M Saladi; Rachel P Galimidi; Bin Zhang; William M Clemons; Thomas F Miller
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 9.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.