Literature DB >> 9733628

Prevention of retrosternal adhesion formation in a rabbit model using bioresorbable films of polyethylene glycol and polylactic acid.

N Okuyama1, K E Rodgers, C Y Wang, W Girgis, M Oz, K St Amand, E Pines, A H DeCherney, E A Rose, D Cohn, G S diZerega.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy of three bioresorbable films of polyethylene glycol (EO) and polylactic acid (LA) (EO/LA = 1.5, 2.5, and 3.0) in the prevention of adhesion formation between the epicardium and the sternum (retrosternal adhesions) in a rabbit model. Retrosternal adhesions were generated by sternotomy, pericardiotomy, and abrasion of the anterior epicardium. The adhesion barrier was placed between the epicardium and the sternum and sutured to the edge of the pericardium. Epicardial adhesions were evaluated 14-20 days later by assessing the area of the epicardium covered by adhesions. In the control rabbits, tenacious adhesions were observed between sternum and the central portion of epicardium (portion exposed through the pericardiotomy) which were difficult to dissect. When a bioresorbable film was placed over the pericardium, adhesion formation at the central strip of the epicardium (area between the sternum and the epicardium exposed through the pericardium) could be reduced or prevented. At this site, the areas of adhesion formation were 0% (EO/LA = 1.5), 8.4 +/- 2.8% (EO/LA = 2.5), and 5.6 +/- 4.7% (EO/LA = 3.0) of the central strip, significantly less than that observed in the control group, 78.0 +/- 5.8% (P < 0.01). At the anterior left and right and posterior apex of the heart (sites where the film was not placed), there were no differences between control and treatment groups. The films were completely resorbed at the time of necropsy in group EO/LA = 2.5 and 3.0. Small pieces of film were observed in group EO/LA = 1.5. In conclusion, the bioresorbable films [EO/LA = 1.5 (REPEL-CV), 2.5, or 3.0] were efficacious in the reduction of retrosternal adhesions to the epicardium. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9733628     DOI: 10.1006/jsre.1998.5317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  6 in total

1.  Novel technique of overlaying a poly-L: -lactic acid nanosheet for adhesion prophylaxis and fixation of intraperitoneal onlay polypropylene mesh in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Keiichi Fujino; Manabu Kinoshita; Akihiro Saitoh; Hidekazu Yano; Kahoko Nishikawa; Toshinori Fujie; Keiichi Iwaya; Minoru Kakihara; Shinji Takeoka; Daizoh Saitoh; Yuji Tanaka
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Current strategies and future perspectives for intraperitoneal adhesion prevention.

Authors:  Christoph Brochhausen; Volker H Schmitt; Constanze N E Planck; Taufiek K Rajab; David Hollemann; Christine Tapprich; Bernhard Krämer; Christian Wallwiener; Helmut Hierlemann; Rolf Zehbe; Heinrich Planck; C James Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Polymers in the prevention of peritoneal adhesions.

Authors:  Yoon Yeo; Daniel S Kohane
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 5.571

Review 4.  A review of animal models for post-operative pericardial adhesions.

Authors:  Morgan A Hill; O Agata Walkowiak; William T Head; Jennie H Kwon; Minoo N Kavarana; Taufiek Konrad Rajab
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-12

5.  "How I do it: utilization of high-pressure sealants in aortic reconstruction".

Authors:  John A Elefteriades
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 1.637

6.  Bioresorbable adhesion barrier for reducing the severity of postoperative cardiac adhesions: Focus on REPEL-CV(®).

Authors:  Martin Haensig; Friedrich Wilhelm Mohr; Ardawan Julian Rastan
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2011-01-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.