BACKGROUND: The effects of hepatic cryosurgery on residual hepatic tumor growth, and on tumor immunity, have not been determined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two experiments were performed. In both, animals (n = 10 per group) had solitary left lobe hepatomas established, and underwent left lobectomy, cryoablation, or control laparotomy. Experiment I: immediately after tumor treatment, intraportal challenge of hepatoma cells was performed to evaluate for the effects of treatment on residual hepatic tumor growth. Experiment II: animals were challenged 14 days after tumor treatment, and splenocyte cytotoxicity assays were performed to evaluate for tumor immunity. Hepatic tumor nodules were counted 3 weeks after challenge in both experiments. RESULTS: In animals challenged immediately after tumor treatment, the mean number of liver nodules at 3 weeks was similar between control and cryoablation groups (65 +/- 13 vs 115 +/- 38, P = 0.17). Animals that had undergone resection, however, had a significant increase in the mean number of nodules as compared to cryoablation (278 +/- 74 vs 115 +/- 38, P = 0. 04) and control (278 +/- 74 vs 65 +/- 13, P = 0.002) animals. In addition, only resection animals had elevation in serum levels of the growth factor FGF-basic, 48 h after treatment (mean = 30 +/- 14 pg/ml). In animals challenged 14 days following treatment, all groups had similar numbers of nodules (resection vs cryoablation, P = 0.8). Splenocyte cytotoxicity was not increased after cryosurgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike partial hepatectomy, cryoablation of hepatomas in rats does not accelerate residual tumor growth in the liver or result in production of the growth factor FGF-basic. We did not find evidence for the development of tumor immunity following cryosurgery. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.
BACKGROUND: The effects of hepatic cryosurgery on residual hepatic tumor growth, and on tumor immunity, have not been determined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two experiments were performed. In both, animals (n = 10 per group) had solitary left lobe hepatomas established, and underwent left lobectomy, cryoablation, or control laparotomy. Experiment I: immediately after tumor treatment, intraportal challenge of hepatoma cells was performed to evaluate for the effects of treatment on residual hepatic tumor growth. Experiment II: animals were challenged 14 days after tumor treatment, and splenocyte cytotoxicity assays were performed to evaluate for tumor immunity. Hepatic tumor nodules were counted 3 weeks after challenge in both experiments. RESULTS: In animals challenged immediately after tumor treatment, the mean number of liver nodules at 3 weeks was similar between control and cryoablation groups (65 +/- 13 vs 115 +/- 38, P = 0.17). Animals that had undergone resection, however, had a significant increase in the mean number of nodules as compared to cryoablation (278 +/- 74 vs 115 +/- 38, P = 0. 04) and control (278 +/- 74 vs 65 +/- 13, P = 0.002) animals. In addition, only resection animals had elevation in serum levels of the growth factor FGF-basic, 48 h after treatment (mean = 30 +/- 14 pg/ml). In animals challenged 14 days following treatment, all groups had similar numbers of nodules (resection vs cryoablation, P = 0.8). Splenocyte cytotoxicity was not increased after cryosurgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike partial hepatectomy, cryoablation of hepatomas in rats does not accelerate residual tumor growth in the liver or result in production of the growth factor FGF-basic. We did not find evidence for the development of tumor immunity following cryosurgery. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.
Authors: Martin J Connor; Taimur T Shah; Gail Horan; Charlotte L Bevan; Mathias Winkler; Hashim U Ahmed Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 66.675