Literature DB >> 9733555

Perceptual and response bias in unilateral neglect: two modified versions of the milner landmark task.

E Bisiach1, R Ricci, M Lualdi, M R Colombo.   

Abstract

Perceptual and response bias in estimating the proportion of the two segments of prebisected lines were disambiguated in a group of 121 patients suffering from left neglect by means of two variants of the Milner Landmark task (Milner et al., 1993). The first variant, LANDMARK-V, required a verbal response; the second variant, LANDMARK-M, required manual pointing. The paper reports and discusses the results obtained on each task and their correlations, as well as the relationships between either kind of bias and the intrahemispheric location of the lesion. It is argued that besides their usefulness as a diagnostic tool the proposed variants of the Milner Landmark task provide results that are worth further investigation in their own right. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9733555     DOI: 10.1006/brcg.1998.1003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  24 in total

1.  Ocular scanning and perceptual size distortion in hemispatial neglect: effects of prism adaptation and sequential stimulus presentation.

Authors:  H Chris Dijkerman; Robert D McIntosh; A David Milner; Yves Rossetti; Caroline Tilikete; Richard C Roberts
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Adaptation to Leftward Shifting Prisms Alters Motor Interhemispheric Inhibition.

Authors:  Elisa Martín-Arévalo; Selene Schintu; Alessandro Farnè; Laure Pisella; Karen T Reilly
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  The role of the right superior temporal gyrus in stimulus-centered spatial processing.

Authors:  Priyanka P Shah-Basak; Peii Chen; Kevin Caulfield; Jared Medina; Roy H Hamilton
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Frontal lesions predict response to prism adaptation treatment in spatial neglect: A randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Kelly M Goedert; Peii Chen; Anne L Foundas; A M Barrett
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.868

5.  The bisection point across variants of the task.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez; Eli Peli
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Effects of illusory spatial anisometry in unilateral neglect.

Authors:  Raffaella Ricci; Lorenzo Pia; Patrizia Gindri
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Underestimation of contralateral space in neglect: a deficit in the "where" task.

Authors:  Sabrina Pitzalis; Francesco Di Russo; Francesca Figliozzi; Donatella Spinelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Presence of Motor-Intentional Aiming Deficit Predicts Functional Improvement of Spatial Neglect With Prism Adaptation.

Authors:  Kelly M Goedert; Peii Chen; Raymond C Boston; Anne L Foundas; A M Barrett
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 3.919

9.  Disentangling input and output-related components of spatial neglect.

Authors:  Tobias Loetscher; Michael E R Nicholls; Amy Brodtmann; Nicole A Thomas; Peter Brugger
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Imaging the neural mechanisms of TMS neglect-like bias in healthy volunteers with the interleaved TMS/fMRI technique: preliminary evidence.

Authors:  Raffaella Ricci; Adriana Salatino; Xingbao Li; Agnes P Funk; Sarah L Logan; Qiwen Mu; Kevin A Johnson; Daryl E Bohning; Mark S George
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.