Literature DB >> 9732887

Changes in pacing lead impedance over time predict lead failure.

M N Sharif1, D G Wyse, J M Rothschild, A M Gillis.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that a decrease in lead impedance may predict pacing lead failure, but there is limited prospective data about the relation of changes in lead impedance over time to lead performance. We monitored changes in lead impedance through implantable pulse generators with real-time telemetry data capability in 105 patients with Medtronic 4012 leads (n = 38) and Medtronic 4004 leads (n = 67). Pacing lead failure was documented by serial ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring or intensified pacemaker clinic surveillance. A significant decrease in lead impedance was observed in patients with Medtronic 4012 and Medtronic 4004 leads with documented lead failure, whereas lead impedance remained stable over time in patients without documented lead failure. The sensitivity and specificity of a lead impedance decrease of > or =15% to predict lead failure were 69% and 70%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of a lead impedance decrease of > or =30% to predict lead failure were 36% and 90%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values for a lead impedance decrease of > or =15% were 54% and 81%, respectively, and for a lead impedance decrease of > or = 30% were 65% and 73%, respectively. Thus, small decreases in lead impedance may identify failing leads. Serial measurement of pacing lead impedance over time is a useful tool to monitor pacing lead performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9732887     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00414-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

Review 1.  Follow up and optimisation of cardiac pacing.

Authors:  Paul R Roberts
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cardiac Devices.

Authors:  Saman Nazarian; Rozann Hansford; Amir A Rahsepar; Valeria Weltin; Diana McVeigh; Esra Gucuk Ipek; Alan Kwan; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Albert C Lardo; Michael A Kraut; Ihab R Kamel; Stefan L Zimmerman; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  A prospective evaluation of a protocol for magnetic resonance imaging of patients with implanted cardiac devices.

Authors:  Saman Nazarian; Rozann Hansford; Ariel Roguin; Dorith Goldsher; Menekhem M Zviman; Albert C Lardo; Brian S Caffo; Kevin D Frick; Michael A Kraut; Ihab R Kamel; Hugh Calkins; Ronald D Berger; David A Bluemke; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  A case series of anomalous high pacing lead impedances in normally functioning leads.

Authors:  Abdul R Mourad; Michael H Kim; Malcolm M Kirk
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2015-09-03

5.  Evidence to support magnetic resonance conditional labelling of all pacemaker and defibrillator leads in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.

Authors:  Anish N Bhuva; Russell Moralee; Tamara Brunker; Karen Lascelles; Lizette Cash; Kush P Patel; Martin Lowe; Neha Sekhri; Francisco Alpendurada; Dudley J Pennell; Richard Schilling; Pier D Lambiase; Anthony Chow; James C Moon; Harold Litt; A John Baksi; Charlotte H Manisty
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 35.855

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.