Literature DB >> 9732339

Cost effectiveness analysis of improved blood pressure control in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 40. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group.

.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the economic efficiency of tight blood pressure control, with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or beta blockers, compared with less tight control in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes.
DESIGN: Cost effectiveness analysis incorporating within trial analysis and estimation of impact on life expectancy through use of the within trial hazards of reaching a defined clinical end point. Use of resources driven by trial protocol and use of resources in standard clinical practice were both considered.
SETTING: 20 hospital based clinics in England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland.
SUBJECTS: 1148 hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes from UK prospective diabetes study randomised to tight control of blood pressure (n=758) or less tight control (n=390). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Cost effectiveness ratios based on (a) use of healthcare resources associated with tight control and less tight control and treatment of complications and (b) within trial time free from diabetes related end points, and life years gained.
RESULTS: Based on use of resources driven by trial protocol, the incremental cost effectiveness of tight control compared with less tight control was cost saving. Based on use of resources in standard clinical practice, incremental cost per extra year free from end points amounted to pound1049 (costs and effects discounted at 6% per year) and pound434 (costs discounted at 6% per year and effects not discounted). The incremental cost per life year gained was pound720 (costs and effects discounted at 6% per year) and pound291 (costs discounted at 6% per year and effects not discounted).
CONCLUSIONS: Tight control of blood pressure in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes substantially reduced the cost of complications, increased the interval without complications and survival, and had a cost effectiveness ratio that compares favourably with many accepted healthcare programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9732339      PMCID: PMC28661     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  17 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of the North Karelia Hypertension Program. 1972-1977.

Authors:  A Nissinen; J Tuomilehto; T E Kottke; P Puska
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Estimating confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios: an example from a randomized trial.

Authors:  M A Chaudhary; S C Stearns
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios: an application of Fieller's theorem.

Authors:  A R Willan; B J O'Brien
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Costs, effects and C/E-ratios alongside a clinical trial.

Authors:  B A van Hout; M J Al; G S Gordon; F F Rutten
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. Final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). SHEP Cooperative Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-06-26       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Long-term cost-effectiveness of various initial monotherapies for mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  J T Edelson; M C Weinstein; A N Tosteson; L Williams; T H Lee; L Goldman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-01-19       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Foot infections in diabetic patients. Decision and cost-effectiveness analyses.

Authors:  M H Eckman; S Greenfield; W C Mackey; J B Wong; S Kaplan; L Sullivan; K Dukes; S G Pauker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-03-01       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Cost-effectiveness of strategies for detecting diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  E J Dasbach; D G Fryback; P A Newcomb; R Klein; B E Klein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  The cost-effectiveness of a cardiovascular multiple-risk-factor intervention programme in treated hypertensive men.

Authors:  M Johannesson; S Agewall; M Hartford; T Hedner; B Fagerberg
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  What can be concluded from the Oxcheck and British family heart studies: commentary on cost effectiveness analyses.

Authors:  D Wonderling; S Langham; M Buxton; C Normand; C McDermott
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-18
View more
  74 in total

Review 1.  The UK prospective diabetes study (UKPDS): clinical and therapeutic implications for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  P King; I Peacock; R Donnelly
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Beta-blockers in the management of hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: is there a role?

Authors:  F Dunne; M J Kendall; U Martin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Treating type 2 diabetes. Study was conducted in exemplary fashion.

Authors:  K M Narayan; G L Beckles; E W Gregg; D F Williamson; J Saaddine; M M Engelgau; F Vinicor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-06

Review 4.  Advantages of using the net-benefit approach for analysing uncertainty in economic evaluation studies.

Authors:  Niklas Zethraeus; Magnus Johannesson; Bengt Jönsson; Mickael Löthgren; Magnus Tambour
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Association of systolic blood pressure with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 36): prospective observational study.

Authors:  A I Adler; I M Stratton; H A Neil; J S Yudkin; D R Matthews; C A Cull; A D Wright; R C Turner; R R Holman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-08-12

Review 6.  Therapeutic modalities in diabetic nephropathy: standard and emerging approaches.

Authors:  Emaad M Abdel-Rahman; Lawand Saadulla; W Brian Reeves; Alaa S Awad
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  The cost effectiveness of cardiovascular medicines.

Authors:  Joel Hay
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.113

8.  Need for differential discounting of costs and health effects in cost effectiveness analyses.

Authors:  Werner B F Brouwer; Louis W Niessen; Maarten J Postma; Frans F H Rutten
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-08-20

9.  Clinic versus home blood pressure measurements in patients with CKD.

Authors:  Robert Stanton
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 10.  Hypertension and chronic kidney disease: controversies in pathogenesis and treatment.

Authors:  J L Pirkle; B I Freedman
Journal:  Minerva Urol Nefrol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.720

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.