Literature DB >> 9732080

Orthopedic residents' perceptions of the content and adequacy of their residency training.

S W Dailey1, M R Brinker, M N Elliott.   

Abstract

The content and adequacy of orthopedic surgery residency training can be evaluated by several means. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the Residency Review Committee set standards with which residency programs must comply in order to be accredited. Residents' perceptions of the content and adequacy of their training is another means of evaluating orthopedic residency training. A questionnaire was sent to all graduating orthopedic residents in the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico. The questionnaire provided program and individual resident demographics, as well as the residents' rating of specific areas of residency training on a 5-point scale (1=superior, 2=above average, 3=average, 4=below average, 5=inadequate). Completed surveys were received from 454 of the 698 graduating orthopedic surgery residents listed by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; the response rate was therefore 65.0%. Our respondents were representative of the entire population in terms of geographic and sex distribution. Respondents rated their general orthopedic training at 1.9. The areas of training that had the best ratings included trauma/fracture (1.8), adult reconstruction (1.9), and pediatrics (1.9). The worst rating was reported for training in foot and ankle (2.7). Factors related to better ratings for general orthopedic training included male sex of residents, programs with more full-time faculty, programs with more hours of weekly teaching conferences, programs with one or more faculty present at all teaching conferences and programs in which residents first operate independently at or before postgraduate year 4. Sixty-six percent of all respondents were planning to hold a fellowship immediately after graduation. The most common fellowships taken included sports medicine (20.5% of all respondents), hand (12.1%), and spine (9.5%). Younger graduating residents, those from larger programs (more residents per year), and those from the Mideast (U.S.), and New England regions were most likely to enter a fellowship after graduation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9732080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)        ISSN: 1078-4519


  6 in total

Review 1.  Surgical fellowship training in Canada: what is its current status and is improvement required?

Authors:  Markku T Nousiainen; David A Latter; David Backstein; Fiona Webster; Kenneth A Harris
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Orthopaedic surgery core curriculum: the spine.

Authors:  Veronica M R Wadey; Jerry Halpern; Jacques Bouchard; Parvati Dev; Richard A Olshen; Decker Walker
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Orthopedic surgery core curriculum hip and knee reconstruction.

Authors:  Veronica M R Wadey; William J Maloney; Parvati Dev; Decker Walker
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Is subspecialty fellowship training emerging as a necessary component of contemporary orthopaedic surgery education?

Authors:  Alan H Daniels; Christopher W DiGiovanni
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-06

5.  Development of a certification examination for orthopedic sports medicine fellows

Authors:  Tim Dwyer; Jaskarndip Chahal; Lucas Murnaghan; John Theodoropoulos; Jeffrey Cheung; Aidan McParland; Darrell Ogilvie-Harris
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  The journey of orthopaedic surgery from residency to fellowship: A cross-sectional study in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries.

Authors:  Mohammed O Shafiq; Aliaa F Khaja; Abdulmuhsen N Alshammari; Mohammad A Altayeb; Khaled M Ghabban; Khalid I Khoshhal
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2019-04-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.