M E Mayo1, S O Ross, J N Krieger. 1. Department of Urology, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: A high prevalence of significant bladder outlet obstruction has been reported among men diagnosed as having "chronic prostatitis." To evaluate the possibility that case selection may determine this high prevalence, we compared findings in patients referred directly to our Urodynamic Unit with that of patients evaluated in our Prostatitis Clinic. METHODS: The videourodynamics records of 201 men aged 18 to 50 years who presented to the Urodynamic Unit with any lower tract symptoms (irritative and/or obstructive with or without pain) were compared with the findings in 123 Prostatitis Clinic patients. The latter were evaluated for obstruction with flow rates and, if abnormal, by retrograde urethrograms and videourodynamics. RESULTS: Only 37 (18%) of 201 patients referred to the Urodynamic Unit had pain as a significant symptom and might have been diagnosed as having chronic prostatitis. Of these 37 patients, 4 (11%) had definite obstruction, 6 (16%) were equivocal, 6 (16%) were hypocontractile, 1 (3%) had pseudodyssynergia, and 7 (19%) had normal findings. The remainder had abnormalities of bladder filling (hypersensitivity in 11 [30%] and detrusor instability in 2 [5%]). Fewer of the 123 patients with prostatitis had obstruction (definite in 2 [1.6%] and equivocal in 1 [0.8%]) (P = 0.03), 2 (1.6%) had hypocontractile detrusors, and 2 had urethral strictures. CONCLUSIONS: Patients referred to the Urodynamic Unit with lower urinary tract symptoms and pain rarely have bladder outlet obstruction. However, they are significantly more likely to have bladder outlet obstruction than patients referred to the Prostatitis Clinic who can be screened for obstruction by history, flow rate, postvoid residual, and retrograde urethrogram.
OBJECTIVES: A high prevalence of significant bladder outlet obstruction has been reported among men diagnosed as having "chronic prostatitis." To evaluate the possibility that case selection may determine this high prevalence, we compared findings in patients referred directly to our Urodynamic Unit with that of patients evaluated in our Prostatitis Clinic. METHODS: The videourodynamics records of 201 men aged 18 to 50 years who presented to the Urodynamic Unit with any lower tract symptoms (irritative and/or obstructive with or without pain) were compared with the findings in 123 Prostatitis Clinicpatients. The latter were evaluated for obstruction with flow rates and, if abnormal, by retrograde urethrograms and videourodynamics. RESULTS: Only 37 (18%) of 201 patients referred to the Urodynamic Unit had pain as a significant symptom and might have been diagnosed as having chronic prostatitis. Of these 37 patients, 4 (11%) had definite obstruction, 6 (16%) were equivocal, 6 (16%) were hypocontractile, 1 (3%) had pseudodyssynergia, and 7 (19%) had normal findings. The remainder had abnormalities of bladder filling (hypersensitivity in 11 [30%] and detrusor instability in 2 [5%]). Fewer of the 123 patients with prostatitis had obstruction (definite in 2 [1.6%] and equivocal in 1 [0.8%]) (P = 0.03), 2 (1.6%) had hypocontractile detrusors, and 2 had urethral strictures. CONCLUSIONS:Patients referred to the Urodynamic Unit with lower urinary tract symptoms and pain rarely have bladder outlet obstruction. However, they are significantly more likely to have bladder outlet obstruction than patients referred to the Prostatitis Clinic who can be screened for obstruction by history, flow rate, postvoid residual, and retrograde urethrogram.