Literature DB >> 9730425

Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine immunosuppressive regimens after lung transplantation: preliminary experience.

D J Ross1, P F Waters, M Levine, M Kramer, S Ruzevich, R M Kass.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil reduces episodes of biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection or treatment failure in the first year after kidney transplantation; however, limited data exist regarding the efficacy after lung transplantation.
METHODS: In a 2-center, nonrandomized concurrent cohort study (level III evidence), we analyzed the incidence of biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grade > or=A2) and decrement in pulmonary function during the first 12 months after successful lung transplantation. All patients received induction immunosuppression with antithymocyte globulin (< or=5 days' duration), cyclosporine and prednisone, in addition to either mycophenolate mofetil (2.0 g/d) [n=11] or azathioprine (1 to 2 mg/kg per day) [n=11].
RESULTS: During the first 12 months after lung transplantation, the mycophenolate mofetil group experienced significantly fewer episodes of acute cellular rejection than the azathioprine group (0.26+/-0.34 vs 0.72+/-0.43 episodes/100 patient-days [mean+/-SD], p < 0.01; 95% CI for the difference=0.126 to 0.813). The change in forced expiratory volume -1 second [deltaFEV1] (liters) between the 3rd and 12th months after lung transplantation was analyzed for the two treatment groups. For this interval, deltaFEV1 for the mycophenolate mofetil group was +0.158+/-0.497 L vs -0.281+/-0.406 L for the azathioprine group (p < 0.05; 95% CI for difference=+0.0356 to 0.843). During the first year, there was 1 death in each group attributed to bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome with concurrent pneumonia. There were no differences in incidence of cytomegalovirus or bacterial infections between the treatment groups; however, a higher prevalence of aspergillus sp airway colonization in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid was observed for the mycophenolate mofetil group (p < .05). The prevalence of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome at 12 months was 36% for the azathioprine group vs 18% for the mycophenolate mofetil group (p=NS).
CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary experience with mycophenolate mofetil after lung transplantation suggests a decreased incidence of biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection. Furthermore, less decline in FEV1 after 12 months may suggest a reduced incidence or delayed onset for development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Prospective randomized trials with low beta error (level I evidence) should be performed to assess the efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil vis-à-vis acute allograft rejection and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9730425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  10 in total

Review 1.  New immunosuppressive drugs and lung transplantation: last or least?

Authors:  J W van den Berg; D S Postma; G H Koëter; W van der Bij
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 2.  Immunosuppression and allograft rejection following lung transplantation: evidence to date.

Authors:  Gregory I Snell; Glen P Westall; Miranda A Paraskeva
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  The emergence of mycophenolate mofetilin dermatology: from its roots in the world of organ transplantation to its versatile role in the dermatology treatment room.

Authors:  Hyunhee Park
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2011-01

Review 4.  New frontiers in immunosuppression.

Authors:  Luke J Benvenuto; Michaela R Anderson; Selim M Arcasoy
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  New strategies for prevention and therapy of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in solid-organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  I G Sia; R Patel
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 6.  Prevention of chronic rejection after lung transplantation.

Authors:  Anke Van Herck; Stijn E Verleden; Bart M Vanaudenaerde; Geert M Verleden; Robin Vos
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Immunosuppression for lung transplantation: evidence to date.

Authors:  Gregory I Snell; Glen P Westall
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Lung microbiota predict chronic rejection in healthy lung transplant recipients: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Michael P Combs; David S Wheeler; Jenna E Luth; Nicole R Falkowski; Natalie M Walker; John R Erb-Downward; Vibha N Lama; Robert P Dickson
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 30.700

Review 9.  Individualizing immunosuppression in lung transplantation.

Authors:  Jennifer K McDermott; Reda E Girgis
Journal:  Glob Cardiol Sci Pract       Date:  2018-03-14

Review 10.  Immunosuppressive strategies in lung transplantation.

Authors:  Paul A Chung; Daniel F Dilling
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.