Literature DB >> 9729544

Effects of the nature of adjuvant and site of parenteral immunization on the serum and mucosal immune responses induced by a nasal boost with a vaccine alone.

B Guy1, S Fourage, C Hessler, V Sanchez, M J Millet.   

Abstract

Outbred OF1 mice were immunized subcutaneously with flu vaccine, either in the neck or in the lumbar region (back), in combination with adjuvants inducing either a Th1- or a Th2-type response, referred to as adjuvants A1 and A2, respectively. After two parenteral immunizations, the mice were boosted intranasally with nonadjuvanted vaccine. The serum response was analyzed after each immunization by measuring specific immunoglobulin A (IgA), IgG1, and IgG2a antibody levels, while the local response (same isotypes) was measured in the salivary glands after the mucosal boost by ELISPOTs. We observed that systemic priming at any of the two sites with a Th2 rather than a Th1 adjuvant dramatically enhanced the mucosal IgG1 and IgA responses following a mucosal boost with unadjuvanted vaccine. In addition, as judged by the IgG2a/IgG1 ratios and serum IgA levels, immunization of mice in the back induced a rise in Th2 response compared to neck immunization with adjuvant A1. In contrast, such back immunization with adjuvant A2 reversed the Th1-Th2 balance in favor of the Th1 response compared to neck immunization. Similar differences were observed in mucosal antibody levels according to the site of priming with one given adjuvant; priming in the back with adjuvant A1 increased the mucosal IgA and IgG1 responses compared to neck priming, while the local IgG2a levels were decreased. The reverse was true for adjuvant A2. Back versus neck priming with this latter adjuvant decreased the mucosal IgG1 response, while local IgG2a levels were increased. The different lymphatic drainages of the two sites of parenteral immunization may explain these differences, due to the targeting of particular lymphoid inductive sites. Some of these sites may represent crossroads between systemic and mucosal immunity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9729544      PMCID: PMC95648          DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.5.5.732-736.1998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol        ISSN: 1071-412X


  16 in total

1.  Cytokine- and Ig-producing T cells in mucosal effector tissues: analysis of IL-5- and IFN-gamma-producing T cells, T cell receptor expression, and IgA plasma cells from mouse salivary gland-associated tissues.

Authors:  J Mega; J R McGhee; H Kiyono
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 2.  Mucosal immunity to vaccines: current concepts for vaccine development and immune response analysis.

Authors:  J R McGhee; H Kiyono
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Targeted lymph node immunization with simian immunodeficiency virus p27 antigen to elicit genital, rectal, and urinary immune responses in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  T Lehner; L A Bergmeier; L Tao; C Panagiotidi; L S Klavinskis; L Hussain; R G Ward; N Meyers; S E Adams; A J Gearing
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1994-08-15       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 4.  New strategies for using mucosal vaccination to achieve more effective immunization.

Authors:  R I Walker
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Comparison between targeted and untargeted systemic immunizations with adjuvanted urease to cure Helicobacter pylori infection in mice.

Authors:  B Guy; C Hessler; S Fourage; B Rokbi; M J Millet
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  1999-03-05       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Protective mucosal immunity elicited by targeted iliac lymph node immunization with a subunit SIV envelope and core vaccine in macaques.

Authors:  T Lehner; Y Wang; M Cranage; L A Bergmeier; E Mitchell; L Tao; G Hall; M Dennis; N Cook; R Brookes; L Klavinskis; I Jones; C Doyle; R Ward
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  Combined parenteral and oral immunization results in an enhanced mucosal immunoglobulin A response to Shigella flexneri.

Authors:  D F Keren; R A McDonald; J L Carey
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Separation and characterization of saponins with adjuvant activity from Quillaja saponaria Molina cortex.

Authors:  C R Kensil; U Patel; M Lennick; D Marciani
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1991-01-15       Impact factor: 5.422

9.  Mechanisms of immunity to leishmaniasis. IV. Significance of lymphatic drainage from the site of infection.

Authors:  L W Poulter; C R Pandolph
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Site-specific immunity to Leishmania major in SWR mice: the site of infection influences susceptibility and expression of the antileishmanial immune response.

Authors:  G S Nabors; J P Farrell
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.441

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of events occurring at mucosal surfaces: techniques used to collect and analyze mucosal secretions and cells.

Authors:  Bruno Guy
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2002-07

2.  Transcutaneous immunization induces mucosal CTLs and protective immunity by migration of primed skin dendritic cells.

Authors:  Igor M Belyakov; Scott A Hammond; Jeffrey D Ahlers; Gregory M Glenn; Jay A Berzofsky
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Heterologous prime-boost oral immunization with GK-1 peptide from Taenia crassiceps cysticerci induces protective immunity.

Authors:  Gladis Fragoso; Fernando Esquivel-Guadarrama; M Angélica Santana; Raul J Bobes; Beatriz Hernández; Jacquelynne Cervantes; René Segura; Fernando A Goldbaum; Edda Sciutto; Gabriela Rosas
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2011-05-18

4.  SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: Potential refinements through induction of mucosal and trained immunity.

Authors:  Amanda Izeli Portilho; Gabrielle Gimenes Lima; Elizabeth De Gaspari
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 2.898

5.  The antibody response in the bovine mammary gland is influenced by the adjuvant and the site of subcutaneous vaccination.

Authors:  Eveline M Boerhout; Ad P Koets; Tanja G T Mols-Vorstermans; Piet J M Nuijten; Mathieu J H Hoeijmakers; Victor P M G Rutten; Jetta J E Bijlsma
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.683

6.  Evaluation of the Relationships between Intestinal Regional Lymph Nodes and Immune Responses in Viral Infections in Children.

Authors:  Yayoi Aoki; Tomoya Ikeda; Naoto Tani; Miho Watanabe; Takaki Ishikawa
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Implementation of a pre-calving vaccination programme against rotavirus, coronavirus and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (F5) and association with dairy calf survival.

Authors:  Dagni-Alice Viidu; Kerli Mõtus
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.741

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.