Literature DB >> 9729368

Chromosome aberration testing in genetic toxicology-past, present and future.

D Kirkland1.   

Abstract

In vitro metaphase tests for chromosomal aberrations (CA) have undergone considerable evolutionary changes over the last 20 yr. Treatment and sampling times have been a particular focus of attention as we have tried to develop protocols that detect weak genotoxins. Different approaches evolved in different parts of the world and led to a need to harmonise. At the same time, we have increasingly challenged the conditions in which clastogens produce positive responses, and several situations have been described in which clastogenic responses would be considered not to be biologically relevant. Now there is a strong case to replace the conventional metaphase analysis test with an in vitro micronucleus test. The time is therefore right to carefully consider whether the type of damage scored in CA tests is relevant for human health. Copyright 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9729368     DOI: 10.1016/s0027-5107(98)00111-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  8 in total

1.  Could contaminant induced mutations lead to a genetic diversity overestimation?

Authors:  Olímpia Sobral; Maria Aparecida Marin-Morales; Rui Ribeiro
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Effects of heavy metal pollution on genetic variation and cytological disturbances in the Pinus sylvestris L. population.

Authors:  Wiesław Prus-Głowacki; Ewa Chudzińska; Aleksandra Wojnicka-Połtorak; Leon Kozacki; Katarzyna Fagiewicz
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Mutagenicity of two herbicides widely used on soybean crops by the Allium cepa test.

Authors:  Maruhen Amir Datsch Silveira; Diego Luis Ribeiro; Thayná Assakawa Dos Santos; Gabriela Maciel Vieira; Carlye Nicheli Cechinato; Michele Kazanovski; Luciana Paula Grégio d'Arce
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 2.058

4.  Protective effects of bioactive phytochemicals from Mentha piperita with multiple health potentials.

Authors:  Seyedeh Maryam Sharafi; Iraj Rasooli; Parviz Owlia; Massoud Taghizadeh; Shakiba Darvish Alipoor Astaneh
Journal:  Pharmacogn Mag       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.085

5.  Cytogenetic study of Ascaris trypsin inhibitor in cultured human lymphocytes with metabolic activation.

Authors:  Joanna Blaszkowska; Wanda Bratkowska; Dobroslawa Lopaczynska; Tomasz Ferenc
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.166

6.  Assessment of the mutagenic activity of extracts of brazilian propolis in topical pharmaceutical formulations on Mammalian cells in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Juliana Marques Senedese; Aline Rafaela Rodrigues; Michelle Andrade Furtado; Viviane Dias Faustino; Andresa A Berretta; Juliana M Marchetti; Denise Crispim Tavares
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 2.629

7.  Comparison of the in vivo and in vitro genotoxicity of glyphosate isopropylamine salt in three different organisms.

Authors:  Carlos Alvarez-Moya; Mónica Reynoso Silva; Carlos Valdez Ramírez; David Gómez Gallardo; Rafael León Sánchez; Alejandro Canales Aguirre; Alfredo Feria Velasco
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 1.771

8.  In Vitro Genotoxicity Assessment of a Novel Resveratrol Analogue, HS-1793.

Authors:  Min Ho Jeong; Kwangmo Yang; Chang Geun Lee; Dong Hyeok Jeong; You Soo Park; Yoo Jin Choi; Joong Sun Kim; Su Jung Oh; Soo Kyung Jeong; Wol Soon Jo
Journal:  Toxicol Res       Date:  2014-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.