Literature DB >> 9728773

Audiometry in general practice: validation of a pragmatic pure-tone audiometry method.

B Karlsmose1, H B Pedersen, T Lauritzen, A Parving.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to validate the results of diagnostic pure-tone audiometry performed in a typical practice setting by comparing with test results obtained in a standardized audiological setting in accordance with the ISO standards. In a single-blinded crossover design, 119 persons were tested (0.25-8 kHz) in both settings. The mean deviations as a function of frequency were in the order of less than 2 dB (0.5-4 kHz) and otherwise up to 4 dB; the practice setting representing the poorer thresholds. The validity of the practice audiometry at three criteria of hearing impairment (0.5-4 kHz) was characterized by sensitivity (82-100%), specificity (95-99%); positive predictive values (75-90%) and negative predictive values (98-100%) focusing on the better ear. It is concluded that pure-tone audiometry of appropriate validity can be performed in general practice and that it is useful in selecting patients with no need of further audiological examination. Guidelines are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9728773     DOI: 10.1080/010503998422638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand Audiol        ISSN: 0105-0397


  3 in total

1.  [Quality control of audiologic results in a university phoniatric/pediatric institution. An example of expert assessment of occupational noise induced hearing loss].

Authors:  S Brosch; K Bürner; H S Johannsen; H de Maddalena; P S Mauz
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  A randomised controlled trial of screening for adult hearing loss during preventive health checks.

Authors:  B Karlsmose; T Lauritzen; M Engberg; A Parving
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Sensitivity and Specificity of Automated Audiometry in Subjects with Normal Hearing or Hearing Impairment.

Authors:  Åsa Skjonsberg; Catrine Heggen; Meisere Jamil; Per Muhr; Ulf Rosenhall
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.867

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.