| Literature DB >> 9728414 |
Abstract
Antibacterial susceptibility testing, fatty acid analysis, protein analysis and DNA analysis of Alcaligenes xylosoxidans subsp. xylosoxidans were compared to determine the efficiency of the methods available for strain typing. Thirty isolates were investigated: 20 clinical isolates from a nonsocomial outbreak in Essen (Germany), 9 clinical isolates from sporadic nosocomial cases in Paris (France) and reference strain ATCC 2402. The highest microbiological discriminative power was exhibited by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) yielding nine types, followed by fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) analysis with six types, and antibacterial susceptibility testing and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with five types each. By combining the results of the four typing methods, 14 varieties could be differentiated. Protein analysis and fatty acid analysis failed to discriminate between isolates from Essen and Paris and the reference strain, while antibacterial susceptibility testing and DNA analysis clearly discriminated them. It is concluded that a combination of antibacterial susceptibility testing and PFGE typing is most suitable for epidemiological typing of Alcaligenes xylosoxidans subsp. xylosoxidans strains.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1998 PMID: 9728414 DOI: 10.1016/s0934-8840(98)80113-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Zentralbl Bakteriol ISSN: 0934-8840