Literature DB >> 9728372

Helmet and shoulder pad removal from a player with suspected cervical spine injury. A cadaveric model.

W F Donaldson1, W C Lauerman, B Heil, R Blanc, T Swenson.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Video fluoroscopy was used to evaluate the motion in an unstable spine during helmet and shoulder pad removal.
OBJECTIVE: To observe the amount of motion that occurs during the removal of helmet and shoulder pads in an injured spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Removal of shoulder pads and helmet from a football player with suspected cervical spine injury can be particularly hazardous. How much flexion occurs at the unstable level during removal of equipment is unknown.
METHODS: Six fresh cadavers were used in the study. In three, an unstable C1-C2 segment was created by transoral osteotomy of the base of C2. In the remaining three, instability was created at C5-C6 by a posterior release. Under fluoroscopic recording, the helmets were removed by first removing the chin strap, face mask, and ear pieces. With the neck stabilized, the helmet was carefully removed. The shoulder pads were carefully removed, with the head stabilized. Angulation, distraction, and space available for the cord were measured at C1-C2. Translation, angulation, distraction, and change in disc height were measured in the specimens with unstable C5-C6.
RESULTS: In cadavers with C1-C2 instability, the mean change in angulation was 5.47 degrees, and space available for the cord was 3.91 mm. Shoulder pads were removed while the head was stabilized. The mean change in angulation at C1-C2 was less during removal of shoulder pads than during helmet removal at 2.9 degrees. Space available for the cord was 2.64 mm. Distraction was also greater during helmet removal (2.98 mm) than during shoulder pad removal (1.76 mm). In the unstable spine, the change in displacement in translation was greater during shoulder pad removal (3.87 mm), than during helmet removal (0.41 mm). Disc height change was similar. Distraction of the spinous processes was greater during helmet removal (3.68 mm) than during shoulder pad removal (1.37 mm). Angulation was similar in both maneuvers.
CONCLUSIONS: Helmet and shoulder pad removal in the unstable cervical spine is a complex maneuver. In the unstable C1-C2 segment, helmet removal causes more angulation in flexion, more distraction, and more narrowing of the space available for the cord. In the lower cervical spine (C5-C6), helmet removal causes flexion of 9.32 degrees, and during shoulder pad removal the neck extends 8.95 degrees, a total of approximately 18 degrees. Disc height changes from 1.24 mm of distraction to 1.06 mm of compression during helmet removal and shoulder pad removal for a total 2.3-mm change. Translation, which correlates with the change in the space available for the cord, is greater at C5-C6 during shoulder pad removal. Because most of the cadavers had C5 anteriorly displaced on C6 to begin with, the extension force during shoulder pad removal caused a 3.87-mm change in reduction of C5 on C6. Because of the motion observed in the unstable spine, helmet and shoulder pad removal should be performed in a carefully monitored setting. They should be removed together by at least three, preferably four, trained people.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9728372     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199808150-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  13 in total

1.  Face-Mask Removal: Movement and Time Associated With Cutting of the Loop Straps.

Authors:  Erik E. Swartz; Susan A. Norkus; Charles W. Armstrong; Douglas M. Kleiner
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  A 3-Dimensional Analysis of Face-Mask Removal Tools in Inducing Helmet Movement.

Authors:  Erik E Swartz; Charles W Armstrong; James M Rankin; Burton Rogers
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  National athletic trainers' association position statement: preventing sudden death in sports.

Authors:  Douglas J Casa; Kevin M Guskiewicz; Scott A Anderson; Ronald W Courson; Jonathan F Heck; Carolyn C Jimenez; Brendon P McDermott; Michael G Miller; Rebecca L Stearns; Erik E Swartz; Katie M Walsh
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Emergent Access to the Airway and Chest in American Football Players.

Authors:  Erik E Swartz; Jason P Mihalik; Laura C Decoster; Sossan Al-Darraji; Justin Bric
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  The riddell ripkord system for shoulder pad removal in a cervical spine injured athlete: a paradigm shift.

Authors:  Michael Kordecki; Danny Smith; Barb Hoogenboom
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-06

Review 6.  Management of cervical spine injuries in athletes.

Authors:  Julian E Bailes; Meredith Petschauer; Kevin M Guskiewicz; Gary Marano
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2007 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  The 6-plus-person lift transfer technique compared with other methods of spine boarding.

Authors:  Gianluca Del Rossi; Marybeth H Horodyski; Bryan P Conrad; Christian P Di Paola; Matthew J Di Paola; Glenn R Rechtine
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Lacrosse equipment and cervical spinal cord space during immobilization: preliminary analysis.

Authors:  Michael Higgins; Ryan T Tierney; Jeffrey B Driban; Steven Edell; Randall Watkins
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  National athletic trainers' association position statement: acute management of the cervical spine-injured athlete.

Authors:  Erik E Swartz; Barry P Boden; Ronald W Courson; Laura C Decoster; MaryBeth Horodyski; Susan A Norkus; Robb S Rehberg; Kevin N Waninger
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Cervical spine motion during football equipment-removal protocols: a challenge to the all-or-nothing endeavor.

Authors:  Bradley Jacobson; Michael Cendoma; Jacob Gdovin; Kevin Cooney; Dustin Bruening
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.